On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 2:51 PM, Ivan Krylov
wrote:
> > My submission was rejected, not because of test failures, but because
> > I had "removed the failing tests which is not the idea of tests." No
> > errors/warnings/notes were reported to me.
>
>
> Try measuring the test coverage of
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 12:59 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
>
> > [ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a
> > mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It
>
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 10:51 AM, Tim Taylor
wrote:
> I'd just use all.equal but I think you could just check the call is
> constructed correctly, e.g.
>
> convenient_modify_matrix <- function(mat) modify_matrix(mat, other_args =
> default)
>
> identical(
> body(convenient_modify_mat
В Tue, 13 May 2025 17:05:14 +
smallepsilon пишет:
> In many package tests, I want to verify that two ways of specifying
> something lead to the execution of exactly the same calculations.
Would you like to try tracing the linear algebra calculations
themselves (together with their arguments)
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> [ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a
> mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It
> also means I can't reply (easily) inline now. ]
>
> In most cases environment varia
[ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a
mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It
also means I can't reply (easily) inline now. ]
In most cases environment variables need to be set before the process
starts. Setting them inside the
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 10:33 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel
wrote:
>
>
> Section 'A.3.1.3 Intel MKL' of the R Installation and Administration manual
> covers that for the MKL case (and general OpenMP cases)
>
> The default number of threads will be chosen by the OpenMP software, but
> c
On Wed, 14 May 2025, at 4:18 PM, smallepsilon wrote:
> No need to apologize. I hope the following example helps clarify what I
> mean. Suppose that modify_matrix(mat, other_args) is a function that,
> among other things, applies eigen() to mat. For good reasons,
> other_args has no default valu
On 14 May 2025 at 15:18, smallepsilon wrote:
| Ben,
|
| No need to apologize. I hope the following example helps clarify what I mean.
Suppose that modify_matrix(mat, other_args) is a function that, among other
things, applies eigen() to mat. For good reasons, other_args has no default
value.
Ben,
No need to apologize. I hope the following example helps clarify what I mean.
Suppose that modify_matrix(mat, other_args) is a function that, among other
things, applies eigen() to mat. For good reasons, other_args has no default
value. It is sometimes convenient, though, to supply the use
> On 14 May 2025, at 02:21, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
…
> There is a higher-level README linked from CRAN package pages but I can't
> find it now :-/
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_issue_kinds.html I believe
Tim
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
On 13 May 2025 at 21:07, Ben Bolker wrote:
| threaded computations. I don't think CRAN multithreads by default (and I
| don't know if they test on MKL at all ...?)
CRAN itself writes at https://cran.r-project.org/CRAN_team.htm :
CRAN QA
CRAN package checks on combinations of various plat
Hmm. The thread you linked to is specifically an issue with
non-deterministic linear algebra, the solution to which is to disable
threaded computations. I don't think CRAN multithreads by default (and I
don't know if they test on MKL at all ...?)
Can you provide more specific/concrete exa
Ben,
The thread to which I alluded is here:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2025-May/480866.html
Further clarification: The package provides some convenience shortcuts for the
user which should run the same calculations as their longer counterparts. I
want to use identical() to provide s
Can you please clarify (maybe by linking back to an earlier thread, don't
remember if you discussed this previously) what you mean by "I realized
that because all.equal() does not test (even as a proxy) that the same
calculations were done"?
On Tue, May 13, 2025, 1:05 PM smallepsilon wrote:
> I
15 matches
Mail list logo
