These recently introduced 'R CMD check' WARNINGs were disabled again
in R-devel on July 8, 2020:
r78793:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/ccd903e47ab42e1c181396256aea56454a2e70c9
r78794:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/b70f90ae11dd516c1c954ed15eb5a7c2a304b37f
This is because there'
To all: I'd like to apologize for my negative tone and imprecision in my
points. Thanks for the discussion and the effort you put into these systems.
> On Aug 9, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2020 3:15 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
>> On 8/9/20 3:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
On 09/08/2020 3:15 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
On 8/9/20 3:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/08/2020 2:59 p.m., John Mount wrote:
Firstly: thanks to Ben for the help/fix.
I know nobody asked, but.
Having to guess where the documentation is just to refer to it is
just going to be really brittle
On 8/9/20 3:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/08/2020 2:59 p.m., John Mount wrote:
Firstly: thanks to Ben for the help/fix.
I know nobody asked, but.
Having to guess where the documentation is just to refer to it is
just going to be really brittle going forward. Previous: if the
function
On 09/08/2020 2:59 p.m., John Mount wrote:
Firstly: thanks to Ben for the help/fix.
I know nobody asked, but.
Having to guess where the documentation is just to refer to it is just going to
be really brittle going forward. Previous: if the function you referred to
existed in the package you w
Firstly: thanks to Ben for the help/fix.
I know nobody asked, but.
Having to guess where the documentation is just to refer to it is just going to
be really brittle going forward. Previous: if the function you referred to
existed in the package you were fine. Future: if don't correctly specify
On 09/08/2020 2:04 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
This might have to be \link[utils:debugger]{dump.frames} now, i.e.
explicitly linking to the man page on which dump.frames is found
rather than following aliases?
It's always had to be that way for reliable links. It's just that the
QC checks are fin
Thanks Ben!
I'll see if that style change works for me.
> On Aug 9, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> This might have to be \link[utils:debugger]{dump.frames} now, i.e.
> explicitly linking to the man page on which dump.frames is found
> rather than following aliases?
>
> On Sun, Aug 9,
This might have to be \link[utils:debugger]{dump.frames} now, i.e.
explicitly linking to the man page on which dump.frames is found
rather than following aliases?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:01 PM John Mount wrote:
>
> With "R Under development (unstable) (2020-07-05 r78784)" (Windows)
> documentat
With "R Under development (unstable) (2020-07-05 r78784)" (Windows)
documentation references such as "\link[utils]{dump.frames}" trigger "Non-file
package-anchored link(s) in documentation object" warnings even if the package
is in your "Imports."
Is that not the right form? Is there any way to
10 matches
Mail list logo
