On 09/08/2020 2:04 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
This might have to be \link[utils:debugger]{dump.frames} now, i.e.
explicitly linking to the man page on which dump.frames is found
rather than following aliases?
It's always had to be that way for reliable links. It's just that the
QC checks are finally warning about the unreliability.
Duncan Murdoch
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 2:01 PM John Mount <jmo...@win-vector.com> wrote:
With "R Under development (unstable) (2020-07-05 r78784)" (Windows) documentation references such as
"\link[utils]{dump.frames}" trigger "Non-file package-anchored link(s) in documentation object"
warnings even if the package is in your "Imports."
Is that not the right form? Is there any way to fix this other than the
workaround of just removing links from the documentation? I kind of don't want
to do that as the links were there to help the user.
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
