Rolf,
The versioning method they’re using is referred to as CalVer
https://calver.org/ (not as catchy as SemVer) and it is actually quite
useful! With one look at the version you can get a good sense of it’s
general release date.
Posit, for example, moved their professional products to use this
v
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:33:40 -0500
Toby Hocking wrote:
> Version jumps in minor (submitted: 2024.11.2, existing: 2024.1.24)
It looks to me that you are setting your version numbers in an
unorthodox manner, which could/will confuse the living Drambuie out of
people.
I conjecture that you are
On 2024-11-04 4:33 p.m., Toby Hocking wrote:
Dear CRAN
I see a new NOTE, and I wonder if you would consider undoing this new
addition to checks? This would cause all of my packages to fail auto
checks, which would cause a lot of extra false positives, and lots of
extra work for both me and the CR
Dear CRAN
I see a new NOTE, and I wonder if you would consider undoing this new
addition to checks? This would cause all of my packages to fail auto
checks, which would cause a lot of extra false positives, and lots of
extra work for both me and the CRAN team who works on approving
submissions whic
Dear Dirk,
Thank you so much for your tips.
I'll implement them and try a new submission.
Best regards,
Olivoto
Em dom., 3 de nov. de 2024 às 14:08, Dirk Eddelbuettel
escreveu:
>
> Tiago,
>
> Looking at https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/noSuggests/pliman.out
> we see it errors after trying '*
On 11/1/24 17:40, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 09:56:01 +0100
Tomas Kalibera wrote:
isn't there a finer-grained way to suppress reports just
of this particular issue, ideally at finer granularity than a
function?
The line saying "function:do_dotCode" in the suppression file will
su
