Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 29/12/2016 2:58 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote: HI All: If any cares, the offending line is in the ggplot2 file utilities.r where it has: #' A waiver object. #' #' A waiver is a "flag" object, similar to \code{NULL}, that indicates the #' calling function should just use the d

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
HI All: If any cares, the offending line is in the ggplot2 file utilities.r where it has: > #' A waiver object. > #' > #' A waiver is a "flag" object, similar to \code{NULL}, that indicates the > #' calling function should just use the default value. It is used in certain > #' functions to d

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
Thanks. I can wait. I will also see if I can figure out a work around in the meantime. Is the submission to winbuild automated? That is really the only way I have to check, but I don't want to keep on checking if someone's time is being wasted by that. If automated, the I don't mind making

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 29/12/2016 1:44 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote: Thanks, but as I said, my next question is how best to proceed with CRAN. I do not want to waste peoples' time with a submission that I know before hand will be rejected. Can I submit with this warning? I'd recommend waiting a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
Thanks, but as I said, my next question is how best to proceed with CRAN. I do not want to waste peoples' time with a submission that I know before hand will be rejected. Can I submit with this warning? -Roy > On Dec 29, 2016, at 10:38 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 29/12/2016 1:24 PM

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 29/12/2016 1:24 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: Sorry, correction/clarification to my last post: it's *not* a bug in ggplot2, rather apparently (?) it's something in base R that has broken tests in both data.table and ggplot2. (Since your code calls ggplot, though, it's presumably in there somewhere,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
Thanks, that is a big help because I had no idea what the error was referring to,. Can I put this in my comments to cran and that will be sufficient? Normally any warning is sufficient for rejection? I just want to make certain the updated submission goes a cleanly as possible. -Roy > On D

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Ben Bolker
Sorry, correction/clarification to my last post: it's *not* a bug in ggplot2, rather apparently (?) it's something in base R that has broken tests in both data.table and ggplot2. (Since your code calls ggplot, though, it's presumably in there somewhere, and (?) not your problem.) cheers Be

Re: [R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Ben Bolker
I think this is a ggplot2-related issue. Matt Dowle posted about it: http://blog.h2o.ai/2016/12/behind-the-scenes-of-cran/ On 16-12-29 01:16 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote: > Hi All: > > I am working on a new submission of my xtractomatic package (the > main change being the use

[R-pkg-devel] warning from win_build

2016-12-29 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
Hi All: I am working on a new submission of my xtractomatic package (the main change being the use of https). I develop on a Mac. When I run on the Mac: devtools::check() I get no errors, notes, or warnings. However, when I run devtools::build_win(), the response I get back isL > * check