My suggestion would be to ask this question in a forum devoted to that topic,
such as the Bioconductor forum [1].
[1] https://www.bioconductor.org/help/support/
On December 3, 2020 11:25:24 AM PST, "Li, Aiguo (NIH/NCI) [E] via R-help"
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>One of our PIs has a targeted sequenci
Dear all,
One of our PIs has a targeted sequencing dataset generated a while ago. He is
interested in finding out VAF of a group of genes. This is the first dataset
of this types we have. I would be appreciative for any suggestions on
pipelines for analyzing this type of data.
Thanks
Anna
David,
On 2019-03-20 12:38, David Winsemius wrote:
On 3/19/19 12:49 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Highly off topic. Try StackOverflow.
As it stands it's off-topic for SO. (You would just be making more
work for those of us who know the rules but need 4 close votes for
migration.) Better would b
On 3/19/19 12:49 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
Highly off topic. Try StackOverflow.
As it stands it's off-topic for SO. (You would just be making more work
for those of us who know the rules but need 4 close votes for
migration.) Better would be immediately posting at CrossValidated.com
(i.e
Highly off topic. Try StackOverflow.
On March 19, 2019 10:42:24 AM PDT, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>People,
>
>I have only a general statistics understanding and have never actually
>used Bayes' Theorem for any real-world problem. My interest lies in
>developing some statistical approach for addres
Actually the list is not moderated in the usual sense of the word. If
you subscribe, your posts are not moderated. Only your first posting
after subscription would be moderated, but for the purpose of preventing
persons with obvious spamming goals.
And there are several different moderators. I
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Evan Cooch wrote:
>
> Just curious -- if R-help is a moderated list (which in theory , it is -- my
> posts have been 'modertated', to the degree that they aren't released to the
> list until someone approves them), and if these 'statistics discussion'
> quest
Just curious -- if R-help is a moderated list (which in theory , it is
-- my posts have been 'modertated', to the degree that they aren't
released to the list until someone approves them), and if these
'statistics discussion' questions are inappropriate to the mission (as
described), then...wh
Rhelp is not a forum for discussions of statistics. Instead it is for
persons who have specific questions about the use of R.
Please read the list info page where you started the subscription
process. And do read the Posting Guide. Both these are linked at the
bottom of this response.
There
People,
I have only a general statistics understanding and have never actually
used Bayes' Theorem for any real-world problem. My interest lies in
developing some statistical approach for addressing the subject above
and it seems to me that BT is what I should be looking at? However,
what I
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> On Monday, November 5, 2012, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>> On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
>>
>>> So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
>>> improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) langua
On Monday, November 5, 2012, Rolf Turner wrote:
> On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
>
>> So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
>> improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) language +
>> extensions?
>>
>
> Are others getting as sick of this
lto:r-help-bounces@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of R. Michael Weylandt
>
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:48 PM
> To: Iurie Malai
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] A general question: Is language S a component part of
> R?
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2012, at
On Nov 5, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Iurie Malai wrote:
> Thanks all!
>
> At least for me, the manual text has a contradiction. If R is much like S,
> in other words it is a "diverged" S, as Michael says, it can't include
> itself as a component part.
I'd think something like C/C++ -- the later includ
On 05-11-2012, at 22:04, Rolf Turner wrote:
> On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
>> So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
>> improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) language +
>> extensions?
>
> Are others getting as sick of this silly,
On 06/11/12 09:40, Iurie Malai wrote:
So, R (as a language) can be viewed as an extended S language (S + some
improvements)? And the R environment includes this (extended) language +
extensions?
Are others getting as sick of this silly, pedantic and completely
irrelevant pseudo-scholasticism as
; language.)
>
> Bill Dunlap
> Spotfire, TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
> On Behalf
> > Of Iurie Malai
> > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 11:38 AM
>
gt; To: Patrick Burns
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] A general question: Is language S a component part of R?
>
> After reading the 'Inferno-ish R' the first thing that comes to mind is
> that R is very much like S, but it's still different (R is not S), so
After reading the 'Inferno-ish R' the first thing that comes to mind is
that R is very much like S, but it's still different (R is not S), so it
can't contain the S as a programming language, as the manual says. Or I'm
wrong?
2012/11/5 Patrick Burns
> There is a bit of history in:
>
> http://ww
There is a bit of history in:
http://www.portfolioprobe.com/2012/05/31/inferno-ish-r/
Pat
On 05/11/2012 17:09, R. Michael Weylandt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Iurie Malai wrote:
In the "Introduction and preliminaries" the "An Introduction to R" manual
says about R: "... Among oth
Thanks all!
At least for me, the manual text has a contradiction. If R is much like S,
in other words it is a "diverged" S, as Michael says, it can't include
itself as a component part.
Regards,
Iurie
2012/11/5 R. Michael Weylandt
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Iurie Malai wrote:
> > In t
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Iurie Malai wrote:
> In the "Introduction and preliminaries" the "An Introduction to R" manual
> says about R: "... Among other things it has ... a well developed, simple
> and effective programming language (Called 'S') ... ". Now I'm a little
> confused. This mean
In the "Introduction and preliminaries" the "An Introduction to R" manual
says about R: "... Among other things it has ... a well developed, simple
and effective programming language (Called 'S') ... ". Now I'm a little
confused. This means that language S is a component part of R? And S is not
fre
Hello Bogdan,
Put in those terms, option b looks more defensible. It sounds like a test of
two proportions, sometimes called z-test. The problem is that, for that test
to be used, you must be sampling from large population.
You know that under regular ChIP-seq sequencing we are lucky if we get 1
Hi everyone,
Although this question is more related to ChIP and ChIP-seq, it could be
probably anchored in a more general statistical context.
The question is : what method is better to assess the significance of the
change in a signal (the signal can be DNA binding, for instance) given the
bac
25 matches
Mail list logo
