Re: [R] Standard errors GLM

2012-03-13 Thread Rubén Roa
roject.org] En nombre de D_Tomas Enviado el: martes, 13 de marzo de 2012 14:39 Para: r-help@r-project.org Asunto: [R] Standard errors GLM Dear userRs, when applied the summary function to a glm fit (e.g Poisson) the parameter table provides the categorical variables assuming that the first leve

Re: [R] Standard errors GLM

2012-03-13 Thread David Winsemius
On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:38 AM, D_Tomas wrote: Dear userRs, when applied the summary function to a glm fit (e.g Poisson) the parameter table provides the categorical variables assuming that the first level estimate (in alphabetical order) is 0. Not really. It returns an estimate for the cont

Re: [R] Standard errors GLM

2012-03-13 Thread Joshua Wiley
Hi, See inline. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:38 AM, D_Tomas wrote: > Dear userRs, > > when applied the summary function to a glm fit (e.g Poisson) the parameter > table provides the categorical variables assuming that the first level > estimate (in alphabetical order) is 0. > > What is the standard

[R] Standard errors GLM

2012-03-13 Thread D_Tomas
Dear userRs, when applied the summary function to a glm fit (e.g Poisson) the parameter table provides the categorical variables assuming that the first level estimate (in alphabetical order) is 0. What is the standard error for that variable then? Are the standard errors calculated assuming