On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:38 AM, D_Tomas wrote:

Dear userRs,

when applied the summary function to a glm fit (e.g Poisson) the parameter
table provides the categorical variables assuming that the first level
estimate (in alphabetical order) is 0.

Not really. It returns an estimate for the contrast of two Poisson parameters which have support on the real line. This is not really the correct list for fixing your misconceptions about GLMs. Your misconceptions are more of a conceptual character rather than an R coding problem. Maybe you should post follow-ups to: stats.stackexchange.com


What is the standard error for that variable then?

It (meaning I assume the coefficient estimate) is not a variable, at least not in the sense of being a data element.


Are the standard errors calculated assuming a normal distribution?

The standard errors are simply the square roots of the diagonals of the variance-covariance matrix (estimated from the deviations on the specified scale of the data from a best fit in a modeling framework). The assumption one makes when turning this into a confidence interval is that _parameters_ are approximately normally distributed using a glm method. You do not necessarily need to accept this method. The 'confint' function in MASS will return CI's based on the profile likelihood.


Many thanks,



--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Standard-errors-GLM-tp4469086p4469086.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to