Re: [R] Letter-based representation of pairwise comparisons

2009-10-06 Thread retama
matrix could be piped succesfully. Regards, Retama goz wrote: > > hello, > > i try to use the multcomp letters, but i have problems with my results : > > here is my pvalue matrix (from a pairwise.t.test) : > > pair=pairwise.t.test(...) > pair$p.value > &

Re: [R] Loop avoidance and logical subscripts

2009-05-27 Thread retama
r of chars. Now, I'm doing it by: dna <- vector() for (i in 1:length(dnaset)) { c(dna, toString(data$dnaset[[i]])) -> dna } Regards, Retama -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Loop-avoidance-and-logical-subscripts-tp236529

Re: [R] Loop avoidance and logical subscripts

2009-05-21 Thread retama
ation of values with c() or cbind() or with logical subscripts is ok or not. And which approach should produce better results in terms of efficiency (my script goes really slow). Thank you, Retama -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Loop-avoidance-and-logical-subscripts-tp23

[R] Loop avoidance and logical subscripts

2009-05-21 Thread retama
sue: library(seqinr) GCsequence <- vector() for( i in 1:(length(data$sequence))) { c(GCsequence,GC(s2c(data$sequence[i])))->data$GCsequence[i] } rm(GCsequence) How should I speed up that? Thank you, Retama -- View this message in context: http://www.nab

Re: [R] Letter-based representation of pairwise comparisons

2009-02-02 Thread retama
1902 0.006141902 0.006141902 0.006141902NA LeafC 0.000617030 0.000617030 0.000617030 0.000617030 0.3242459 $p.adjust.method [1] "bonferroni" >multcompLetters(test$p.value) FlowerB FlowerC FlowerD LeafA LeafC "a" "b" "c" &q

[R] Letter-based representation of pairwise comparisons

2009-01-08 Thread retama
accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-21655824_ITM), but I can't find an R implementation. Does anyone know how to do that? Thank you!! Retama -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Letter-based-representation-of-pairwise-comparisons-tp21350364p21350364.html Sent from the