This isn't my field. But I'd have expected a sentence along the lines of:
Stock prices were obtained from Yahoo Stocks[1] using the Quantmod R
statistics package[2].
1. Yahoo Citation
2. Quantmod citation
That is readable. A further sentence:
All analytical code is available from a publicly acc
The _point_ is to explain the story of the research so people can compare
easily with other work. A story interrupted by tedious details is not very
comprehensible. And I _did_ recommend providing a link to a code repository and
using reproducible coding tools.
On December 30, 2024 7:35:37 PM P
Maybe I misunderstand, but if the results cannot be reproduced, what is the
point? I did some secret stuff (after talking to my friend the witch doctor)
and here are my results. Some analyses preclude exact reproduction, but then
researchers should rerun the analysis several times to provide a r
While asking if you should document what you did and give credit where due
seems... unnecessary (of course you should) ... I believe we are beyond the
point where a paper alone can allow me to reproduce most relevant published
analyses. That is, including a link to a reproducible code repository
Great! Thank you.
Erin Hodgess, PhD
mailto: erinm.hodg...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 5:02 PM Ebert,Timothy Aaron wrote:
> Yes, you need to cite the source of data and the method for retrieval. You
> also need to cite programs used in manipulating the data, cleaning the
> data, and ana
Yes, you need to cite the source of data and the method for retrieval. You also
need to cite programs used in manipulating the data, cleaning the data, and
analyzing the data. I should be able to read what you wrote, and using those
methods recover the data independently from you and finish all
6 matches
Mail list logo
