Yes, a clear thinko... Thanks for the correction.
-- Bert
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:41 PM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 04/02/2020 4:28 p.m., Ana Marija wrote:
> > I tired your code on this simplified data just for say 10 permutations:
> >
> > dat <- read.table(text = " code.1 code.2 code.3 code.
On 04/02/2020 4:28 p.m., Ana Marija wrote:
I tired your code on this simplified data just for say 10 permutations:
dat <- read.table(text = " code.1 code.2 code.3 code.4
1 82 93 NA NA
2 15 85 93 NA
3 93 89 NA NA
4 81 NA NA NA",
I tired your code on this simplified data just for say 10 permutations:
dat <- read.table(text = " code.1 code.2 code.3 code.4
1 82 93 NA NA
2 15 85 93 NA
3 93 89 NA NA
4 81 NA NA NA",
header = TRUE, stringsAsFacto
I am not going to do your programming for you. If the following doesn't
suffice, maybe someone else will provide you something that will.
m = your matrix
code = your code that uses m
your list of results <- lapply(seq_len(1000), FUN = function(m){
m <- m[, sample.int(132)]
code
} )
or use an
Basically I would just reshuffle column names in each of 1000 permutations
how to do that and perform everything I described in my initial email
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 14:46, Ana Marija wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
> thanks for getting back to me. I have to permute those 132 columns
> 1000 times and perfo
Hi Bert,
thanks for getting back to me. I have to permute those 132 columns
1000 times and perform the code given in the previous email.
Can you please show me how you would do that in the loop? This is also
a huge data set ...
Thanks
Ana
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:34 PM Bert Gunter wrote:
>
> I
If you just want to permute columns of a matrix,
?sample
> sample.int(10)
[1] 9 2 10 8 4 6 3 1 5 7
and you can just use this as an index into the columns of your matrix,
presumably within a loop of some sort.
If I have misunderstood, just ignore.
Cheers,
Bert
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 a
Hello,
I have a matrix
> dim(dat)
[1] 15568 132
It looks like this:
NoD_14381_norm.1 NoD_14381_norm.2 NoD_14381_norm.3
NoD_14520_30mM.1 NoD_14520_30mM.2 NoD_14520_30mM.3
Ku8QhfS0n_hIOABXuE 4.75 4.25 4.79
4.33 4.63
Inline.
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:12 AM Ana Marija
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a set of two conditions: individual.
Hello,
I have a set of two conditions: individual.variance and
intra.individual.variance
with their p values.
Does it make sense to compare variances between those two groups with
F test via:
var.test(b$inter.individual.variance, b$intra.individual.variance,
alternative = "two.sided")
If not wh
Thanks. Probably should have said that the spreadsheets were originally created
with the type of the data carefully defined to try to minimise
mess (though I hadn't foreseen this little issue). Unfortunately that
formatting has clearly been overridden in at least some of the data collection
sit
This list can be priceless (and has taught me so much over, hm, over a decade
certainly now!)
Thanks both: makes perfect sense (of course) and shows my naivety in the way I
was thinking about this.
I'm intrigued that it's LibreOffice actually using lower precision that avoids
the issue that w
Excel itself will store numeric data as numeric unless you explicitly say that
they are not. I.e., 9.13 gest stored in floating point, with the innate binary
rounding issues which you can also see from R
> print(9.13, digits=20)
[1] 9.1307816
> print(1.14, digits=20)
[1] 1.13
Hi
Floating point representation
I prepared excel file with arbitrary first row and second row
45.65 and 45.65/5
The division result should be 9.13 (exactly), but based on floation point
representation in binary computers (FAQ 7.31) it results in 9.12999...
However Excel shows exact value (
This is a very odd error I'm hitting using read_xlsx from the readxl package
(version 1.3.1) with R version 3.6.2 (2019-12-12) , platform
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (and updated Ubuntu 18.04). I have some largeish Excel
spreadsheets that contain clinical data. I can't share the entire raw data but
I t
15 matches
Mail list logo