Indeed, you don't have to write code with constructs you don't like, but
you should be able to read it. Considerable effort under the label "scope"
[1] is expended in programming language design specifically to allow
re-use of variable names in different contexts. Because I do understand
scope,
Not sure I understand what you really want, if you have found ways to
accomplish what you want but are not satisfied with them. That is one
reason why keeping the mailing list involved (by reply-all) is good for
you. From my end, I don't do one-on-one support online, and may not be
able to carr
Hi Jeff,
I have been trying different methods and found your approach is the most
efficient. I am able to resolve the string-parsing problem. Let me report
back to the group.
This following example explains what I was trying to achieve.
melt.results is where the strings reside, testdata is a sni
Hi,
I have a dataframe which I need to plot in ggplot2 it looks like this :-
head(nodelta_firstexon)
Value Type Histone
1 0.06 high H3K27ac
2 0.12 low H3K27ac
4 0.04 high H3K27me3
5 0.16 low H3K27me3
7 0.02 high H3K36me3
8 0.13 low H3K36me3
I have another data frame with p-v alues
Hi Carl,
The duplicate names were to demonstrate the difference in search path
and environment, since you appeared to be confused.
If you dislike with, don't use it.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Carl Sutton wrote:
> Hi Sarah
>
> I see the difference, but pardon the big yawn, who writes cod
Your architecture has a bad smell to me. For one thing you are mixing different
units in the same vector but should be putting multiple instances of the same
variable into one vector. Lists of vectors (data frames) are typically used
when multiple variables need to be grouped.
Another problem i
Try do.call(), as in
> func2 <- function(time, temp) paste(time, temp)
> func2(121, 10)
[1] "121 10"
> do.call(func2, as.list(c(121,10)))
[1] "121 10"
> do.call(func2, list(121,10))
[1] "121 10"
>
> func2(121, time=10:12)
[1] "10 121" "11 121" "12 121"
> do.call(func2, list(121,time=10:12))
[1] "1
Hi
I am trying to read a grib2 file in R.
Here is my script
library(rgdal)
library(sp)
library(rNOMADS)
gribfile<-"tmax.01.2011040100.daily.grb2"
grib <- readGDAL(gribfile)
I am getting following error :
dec_jpeg2000: Unable to open JPEG2000 image within GRIB file.
Is the JPEG2000 driver availa
Hello,
I would like to define an arbitrary function of an arbitrary number of
variables, for example, for 2 variables:
func2 <- function(time, temp) time + temp
I'd like to keep variable names that have a meaning in the problem (time
and temperature above).
If I have a vector of values
Hello,
I would like to define an arbitrary function of an arbitrary number of
variables, for example, for 2 variables:
func2 <- function(time, temp) time + temp
I'd like to keep variable names that have a meaning in the problem (time and
temperature above).
If I have a vector of values for th
Like others on the list I have no interest in wading through your
block of HTML-mangled text.
But if your question is clearly stated by the subject line, then it's
quite straightforward.
with() saves you typing and often increases code clarity by telling R
where to look for named variables
# Thi
Not exactly, all.equal is much more complete.
It accepts all kinds of objects, not just vectors.
Rui Barradas
Citando Ivan Calandra :
Hi,
Not sure, but it seems that your function equal() is exactly what
all.equal() does, isn't it?
Ivan
--
Ivan Calandra, PhD
Scientific Mediator
Univers
Hi Bert: I saw that and let it through. I am not the one to ask but as far
as I know,
the filtering has not changed.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> To all:
>
> r-help has been holding up a lot of my recent messages: Have there
> been any changes to help list filters that c
Hello all,
I apologize if this is the incorrect forum for this query. I am a package
maintainer, and would like to have a doi for the package manual. What might
be a good way to go about this?
kindest regards,
Stephen Sefick
--
Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that a
Matching 100 to 100.0 or 100.00 or whatever N number of decimales will
always return a TRUE.
The expression your using is correct. A more complete expression would be
kidmomiq[100 == kidmomiq$mom_iq, ].
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Matti Viljamaa wrote:
I need to pick from a dataset those
Hi,
Not sure, but it seems that your function equal() is exactly what
all.equal() does, isn't it?
Ivan
--
Ivan Calandra, PhD
Scientific Mediator
University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne
GEGENAA - EA 3795
CREA - 2 esplanade Roland Garros
51100 Reims, France
+33(0)3 26 77 36 89
ivan.calan...@univ-
Hello,
See FAQ 7.31.
It's irrelevant if you write 100 or 100.0, the values are the same.
The difference would be between 100 (double) and 100L (integer).
To check for equality between floating-point numbers you can use, for
instance, the following function.
equal <- function(x, y, eps = .Ma
On Sep 9, 2016 12:14 AM, "Jun Shen" wrote:
>
> Hi Ista,
>
> Imagine we have a data set called "all.exposure" with variables
"TX","WTCUT" for a function.
I don't think imagining your situation is the best way. Make an example so
we can actually see what you are working with.
The concatenated stri
Hello Enrico,
2016-09-08 10:41 GMT-03:00 Enrico Schumann :
> Hi Veronica,
>
> please see inline.
>
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2016, Veronica Andreo writes:
>
> > Hello Luisfo and Enrico,
> >
> > Thanks for your help! I've been testing both
> > solutions... results differ for the same date (I
> > changed b
Use & instead of &&
--Ista
On Sep 9, 2016 8:12 AM, "Matti Viljamaa" wrote:
> I’m getting strange behaviour when trying to extract rows from a
> two-column data.frame with double values.
>
> My data looks like:
>
>mom_iq kid_score
> 1 121.1175065
> 289.3618898
> 3
I’m getting strange behaviour when trying to extract rows from a two-column
data.frame with double values.
My data looks like:
mom_iq kid_score
1 121.1175065
289.3618898
3 115.4432085
499.4496483
…
and I’m testing extracting rows that have mom_
I need to pick from a dataset those rows that have a double value set to 100.
However since the values in this column are like the following:
[1] 121.11750 89.36188 115.44320 99.44964 92.74571 107.90180
[7] 138.89310 125.14510 81.61953 95.07307 88.57700 94.85971
[13] 88.96280 114.11430 100
> Marc Schwartz
> on Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:29:38 -0500 writes:
>> On Sep 8, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>>
>> To all:
>>
>> r-help has been holding up a lot of my recent messages: Have there
>> been any changes to help list filters that caused this? Is
23 matches
Mail list logo
