>>>>> Marc Schwartz <marc_schwa...@me.com> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:29:38 -0500 writes:
>> On Sep 8, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> To all: >> >> r-help has been holding up a lot of my recent messages: Have there >> been any changes to help list filters that caused this? Is there >> something I'm doing wrong? -- I have made no changes that I am aware >> of. Here's what I get: >> >> Your mail to 'R-help' with the subject >> >> Re: [R] with and evaluation [for example] >> >> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. >> >> The reason it is being held: >> >> The message headers matched a filter rule >> >> >> Best, >> Bert > Bert, > Have there been a lot of cc's in your replies? > That is one thing that will tend to trigger the spam filters. I am not sure what the threshold is and I am not sure that Martin knows, but that has bitten me in the past on R-Help. As co-moderator with Martin on R-Devel, I have seen the other side of it there. > Might also be the e-mail domain of one of the respondents in the thread. > I think that it is the ETHZ SysAdmins that tend to control the formalized spam filters and heuristics. > Regards, > Marc Thank you, Marc. Additionally, and with a bit more details, the reason " The message headers matched a filter rule " is really from the very last filter bank, which is 'mailman' and to answer Bert's question wrt that: No, nor the mailman setup, nor the R-help specific extra filters have changed during the last months, probably not even during the last years. The mailman filters however *do* look at some of the upstream spam filter results (most of which are ETH wide), and these do change of course, continually being adapted. Martin ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.