I am trying to call the lapack routine dgesv in the R distribution from
the fortran code for a package, but when I dyn.load("dse1.so") I get an
error about undefined symbol: dgesv_
I thought the proper incantation was
MAKEFLAG="FLIBS=/path to/R-2.1.1/libRlapack.so" R CMD SHLIB dse1.f
but appar
arguments could be ignored, but it
does not really make sense to introduce a new generic with that in mind.
(I would also prefer that the "object" argument was called "model" but
this is less important.)
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r
contexts where nsim and seed do not make
sense. I realize that the default arguments could be ignored, but it
does not really make sense to introduce a new generic with that in mind.
(I would also prefer that the "object" argument was called "model" but
this is less impor
ations and
then do the analysis of them. In a Monte Carlo experiment the generated
data set is just too big. A better approach is to do the analysis and
save only necessary information after each simulation. That is the
approach, for example, in dse2:::EstEval.
Paul
Paul Gilbert wrote:
> Can th
Could loadings() in R-2.2.0 please be made generic?
Thanks,
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Could acf() in R-2.2.0 please be made generic?
Thanks,
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
re I can clearly see the reason for wanting to
start consideration of this at an earlier point in the development cycle.
Best,
Paul
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Paul Gilbert wrote (in two separate messages)
>
>> Could loadings() in R-2.2.0 please be made generic?
&g
Gavin Simpson wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 12:52 -0400, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>
>>Brian
>>
>>It would help if I understood general principles. I thought one would
>>want a case for NOT making functions generic, rather than a case for
>>making them gen
Brian
Ok, lets leave this for now. When does the development cycle start for
the next version that would allow making a function generic?
Paul
Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>
>
>>Brian
>>
>>It would help if I understood
Martin Maechler wrote:
> I've changed the subject in the hope some more people would
> voice an opinion...
...
> Now I even propose to have
>
> options(add.smooth = TRUE)
>
> as a new default.
>
> Do I get a reaction now?
> Martin
I think you may break a lot of things if you
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 9/19/2005 10:01 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
>>> I've changed the subject in the hope some more people would
>>> voice an opinion...
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> Now I even
Seth Falcon wrote:
>On 20 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>As I said above, and will try to emphasize, I really do not want R
>>CMD check to do any checking of Uses (unless asked to do
>>so). Developers that use Uses need to make sure that their package
>>works and passes R CMD check whe
round in the R build itself or the installation
>>scripts?
>>
>>
>
>No, not a new feature in R-2.2.0, it has been there for some time now.
>
>
I have the impression the feature behaves slightly differently as of
R-2.2.0. Now the 00LOCK file is not removed in So
nu/R/SunOS-sparc32/R-2.2.0/bin/INSTALL: test: argument
expected
may be a clue.
(BTW. If there is a simple answer to the libz problem then I would
appreciate hearing.)
Paul Gilbert
> install.packages(c("RMySQL"), Sys.getenv("R_LIBS"), repos =
"http://cran.
methods to be
checked consistently against one or the other. Is this deteremined by
Depends in the DESCRIPTION file, the NAMESPACE, or something else?
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
will that
override? This is all with a fairly "clean" test environment. What
happens when other packages are attached? Where/how does it break when
there are other packages attached that need conflicting generics (or can
that actually work)?
Thanks,
Paul
Kurt Hornik wrote:
>&g
alue must be a matrix, so I suggest
sticking with the current non-specific structure for the return value.
(For piecewise linear or other non-linear analysis there may be good
reasons to allow more general structures for the loadings.)
Paul Gilbert
__
ions.
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
>
>> I am trying to put an ouml in an .Rd file with no success. Writing R
>> Extensions suggests:
>>
>> Text which might need to be represented differently in different
>> encodings should be marked by |\enc|,
In the file factanal.Rd the line
then the first fit is started at the value suggested by J\ureskog
should be
then the first fit is started at the value suggested by
\enc{J\ureskog}{Joreskog}
or whatever that translates to on a system that does not mangle cut and
paste of s
TION file tag
GettingStarted: foo.Intro
probably as an optional tag to begin.
Of course, the biggest simplification happens when things like this are
done in a similar way by everyone. ( "configure ; make" is not
specified RNG to "buggy Kinderman-Ramage".
Perhaps there does need to be a protocol for testing before release.
When my package setRNG fails then many of my other packages will also
fail because they depend on it. This is a simple fix but reverse
dependencies may make it look like lots of
ly and you have to specify it.) Then
if you accidentally put singles, like a constant 0.0 rather than a
constant 0.0D+0, into a double you will have small junk in the lower
precision part.
(I am assuming you are talking about a sum of reals, not integer or
complex.)
HTH,
Paul Gilbert
On 2/14/
, so don't
put in anything you are experimenting with.
Good luck,
Paul Gilbert
On 6/1/19 8:02 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
On 6/1/19 1:32 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Jun 1, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Peter Langfelder
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:22 AM Therneau, Terry
I used to get caught by this c() behaviour often, but now I do expect it to
drop attributes. I think it would break many things if you change it, and force
people to write different code when they really do want to drop attributes.
When you want new behaviour it is usually better to define a new
Possibly you are using x11() or postscript() to open a graphics device?
You need to use something generic like dev.new() or nothing (a device
will open automatically). I would check that first, though it does not
really explain the second problem.
Paul
>-Original Message-
>From: r-devel-b
With fortran I have always managed to be able to get identical results
on the same computer with the same OS. You will have trouble if you
switch OS or hardware, or try the same hardware and OS with different
math libraries. All the real calculations need to be double, even
intermediate variables.
From R-help
...
>I notice that you have the IPSUR package loaded; you know, just a
>shot in the dark here, but did you try not loading it?
>
>I ask because the vignette is built by making a special choice for
>set.seed, and the workspace that ships with the package might be
>interacting in an unex
With R-rc_2010-10-11_r53297.tar.gz I am getting
...
** building package indices ...
** testing if installed package can be loaded
Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) :
unable to load shared object
'/home/mfa/gilp/toolchain/R/src/R-rc/library/cluster/libs/cluster.so':
/home/mfa
At one time I lobbied for putting something in base or a required package, and
it was suggested that the idea at the time was to remove things rather than add
them. Generally, I agree that is a good idea, so I did not lobby more.
When this question comes up it is always asked, and answered, in
Is anyone else having trouble connecting to R-forge svn? (Perhaps I missed an
outage announcement, or is it bad weather?)
Paul
La version française suit le texte anglais.
-
Spencer
Would it not be easier to include this kind of test in a small file in the
tests/ directory?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Spencer Graves
Sent: January 17, 2011 3:58 PM
To: Dominick Samperi
Cc: Pa
code, is there an easy way to do this, or do I have
to convert the generic to S4 and then make those methods deal with the S3
objects?
(Using R 2.12.1 on Ubuntu 10.10.)
Paul Gilbert
La version française suit
(subject changed from: RE: [Rd] Avoiding name clashes: opinion on best practice
naming conventions)
Dominick
Is this really true? Is there a speed advantage to defining a local function
this way, say, within another function, and then calling it within a loop
rather than the original? Do you
from pk2. This
works, except when I try to use a function defined in pk1, Within the function
the S4 method does not seem to be visible.
Do I have to export an S4 generics and default methods from pk1 or am I doing
something else wrong?
Paul Gilbert
Is it possible in R to call a fortran routine that sets variables in a common
block and expect the values to persist when a call is made from R to a second
routine that uses the common block?
If not (as I suspect), is it possible to use a common block in a group of
routines that are used toget
2011 3:44 AM
> To: Paul Gilbert
> Cc: r-devel@r-project. org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] fortan common block
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Paul Gilbert
> wrote:
> > Is it possible in R to call a fortran routine that sets variables in
> a common block and expect the values
011 11:48 AM
> To: Paul Gilbert
> Cc: r-devel@r-project. org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] fortan common block
>
> AFAIK it's all much simpler that you think. Technically common blocks
> are just FORTRAN's slightly complicated way to declare and access
> global variables.
I thought the usual logic was that you might put graphs and images into a
vignette, and you might refer to the vignette in an Rd help file, but you would
not put the graphs into the help because ? access to the page cannot assume
that you actual have a graphics device. Of course, examples in the
> No one is
> checking that there's not a function in ggplot2 that secretly sends me
> all your code and data ;)
Well, it is open source so we could check it. Hopefully you are checking this
yourself, because it would be a criminal offense to do that. ;)
Paul
===
It does not look like your calculation is using the random number generator, so
the other responses are probably more to the point.
However, beware that setting the seed is not enough to guarantee the same
random numbers. You need to also make sure you are using the same uniform RNG
and any o
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-bounces@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel Becker
> Sent: July 22, 2011 11:38 AM
> To: Spencer Graves
> Cc: Alireza Mahani; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Best practices for writing R functions
>
> On
Is there an easy way to compile a packages's fortran so that it has the
information for ddd or gdb to follow the lines of the code? I seem to remember
seeing something about this, but I cannot find it in Writing R Extensions. (I
see about Valgrind, debugging a segfault, and some other tricks, bu
My understanding is that this cannot be done, for both licence and security
reasons. The package build expects source code and removes binaries. You can
link with binaries that are provided separately from the package, possibly
coming from a vendor that sells non-open source code, but you cannot
Michael
You might look at my TSzip package on CRAN. There are examples in the Guide:
http://cran.at.r-project.org/web/packages/TSzip/vignettes/Guide.pdf. The
package may not work directly, since it is designed for time series data (the
example is daily market data.) But the general idea of just
Other than the RServe part, I do this all the time. It works well. Perhaps we
can put together some notes off-line and then bring it back to the list.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-bounces@r-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Cook, Malcolm
> Se
On 06/30/2015 11:33 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 30/06/2015 5:27 PM, Lorenz, David wrote:
There is something I'm really missing here. The function show is a
standardGeneric function, so the correct way to write it as method like
this:
That describes methods::show. The problem is that the de
On 10/22/2015 03:55 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I'm planning on adding some new WebGL functionality to the rgl package,
but it will pull in a very large number of dependencies. Since many
people won't need it, I'd like to make the new parts optional.
The general idea I'm thinking of is to put th
ble combinations
of missing Suggested packages, but that's probably far too slow to be a
default.
But how do you decide pass/fail when you do this? I think it will only
pass when all the suggested packages are available?
Paul Gilbert
BTW, I'm not completely sure it needs to be possibl
And, no I did not get burned by the R 1.7.0 change in the default
generator. I got burned by a much earlier, unadvertised, and more subtle
change in the Splus generator.)
Paul Gilbert
so it's not obvious that we
would do it.
Duncan Murdoch
On 30/08/2016 5:45 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Wh
On 09/08/2016 01:22 PM, Gabriel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:05 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
Shouldn't binary operators (arithmetic and logical) should throw an error
when one operand is NULL (or other type that doesn't make sense)? This is
a different case than a zero-length operan
it annoys me precisely when I need to be
annoyed, that is, when I haven't thought through the consequences of
sending zero-length arguments.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 09/08/2016 01:22 PM, Gabriel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:05 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
In R 3.3.2 detectCores() in package parallel reports 2 rather than 1 on
Raspberry Pi B+ running Raspbian. (This report is just 'for the record'.
The model is superseded and I think no longer produced.) The problem
seems to be caused by
grep processor /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
model n
om numbers you need to keep
track of both the starting seed and the number of nodes.)
Paul Gilbert
On 11/05/2017 10:58 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 5 Nov 2017, at 15:17 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 04/11/2017 10:20 PM, Daniel Nordlund wrote:
Tirthankar,
"random number generators" d
m a time when simple double precision was the norm, the
tolerances are already fairly relaxed so I hesitate to adjust them with
actually examining the results.
Paul Gilbert
On 2021-02-22 3:30 a.m., Travers Ching wrote:
I noticed CRAN is now doing checks against Apple M1, and some packages are
.0658141036401502788e-14
[4] -3.5527136788005009294e-15
I hope this helps you to track it down.
Cheers,
Simon
On Mar 1, 2021, at 4:50 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
If there was a response to the "how can I test it out" part of this question
then I missed it. Can anyone point to a Win-b
I am being asked to modernize the Depends line in the DESCRIPTION file
of some packages. Writing R Extensions says:
The general rules are
Packages whose namespace only is needed to load the package using
library(pkgname) must be listed in the ‘Imports’ field and not in
the ‘Depends
Simon
Thanks, that helps a lot, but see below ..
On 13-07-31 08:35 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I am being asked to modernize the Depends line in the DESCRIPTION
file of some packages. Writing R Extensions says:
The general rules are
Packages
On 13-08-26 12:04 PM, Gavin Simpson wrote:
Right Henrik, but then you have to document it or R CMD check raises a
Warning, which is less likely to pass muster when submitting to CRAN.
So you document that method on your existing method's Rd page (just
via an \alias{}), which is fine until the u
I have a package (TSdbi) which provides end user functions that I
export, and several utilities for plugin packages (e.g. TSMySQL) that I
do not export because I do not intend them to be exposed to end users. I
call these from the plugin packages using TSdbi::: but that now
produces a note in
On 13-08-28 12:29 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I have a package (TSdbi) which provides end user functions that I export, and
several utilities for plugin packages (e.g. TSMySQL) that I do not export
because I do not intend them to be exposed to
ol over our own test cases.
IMHO, testing is the justification of CRAN's reputation and quality,
and that is a part of what CRAN does.
In God we trust, and everyone else should bring tests.
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2
On 13-08-28 05:13 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
3/ Some functions are exported normally but hidden by using "." in the
beginning of their names. Other package maintainers would know they exist,
but end users would not so easily find them. (Duncan's other suggestion of
using \keyword{internal} in
This is related to the recent thread on correct NAMESPACE approach when writing
S3 methods. If your methods are S4 I think pkgB does not need to export the
generic. Just export the method and everything works magically and your problem
disappears. For S3 methods there seems to be the difficultly
Michael
(Several of us are struggling with these changes, so my comments are
from the newly initiated point of view, rather than the fully
knowledgeable.)
On 13-09-12 09:38 AM, Michael Friendly wrote:
I received the following email note re: the vcdExtra package
A vcd update has shown that
On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 10:38, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13/09/2013 10:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 September 2013 at 09:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | Changes are generally announced in the NEWS.Rd file long before release,
| > | b
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact
that we (as
| >
On 13-09-14 07:20 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-14 12:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I
(subject changed from Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies )
...
Yes useful. But that includes a package build system (which is what
breaks on
R-Forge). If you could do that on a six-pack then could you fix R-Forge
on a
three-pack first please? The R-Forge build system is itself an open source
On 13-09-16 05:19 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
...
Yes, and I could see really rare circumstances where vignette building
takes a long time and the maintainer decides not to build vignettes as
part of the daily checks.
...
I thought 'BuildVignettes: FALSE' only turns of assembling the pdf, all
the co
Simon
Your idea to use SQLite and the nature of some of the sorting and
extracting you are suggesting makes me wonder why you are thinking of R
data structures as the home for the data storage. I would be inclined to
put the data in an SQL database as the prime repository, then extract
parts
On 13-09-23 08:20 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Brian Ripley's reply describes how it is done in the tools package. For
example, as I sent privately to Jeroen,
x <- system2("Rscript", "-e \"install.packages('MASS',
repos='http://probability.ca/cran')\"", stdout=TRUE, stderr=TRUE)
captures all of
On 13-09-27 06:05 PM, Peter Langfelder wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
wrote:
Peter,
This is a relatively "new" warning from R CMD check (for some definition of
new). The authors of Hmisc have clearly not yet gone through the process of
cleaning it up, as you ar
On 13-10-20 04:58 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 13-10-20 4:43 PM, Jonathan Greenberg wrote:
I'm working on an update for my CRAN package "spatial.tools" and I noticed
a new warning when running R CMD CHECK --as-cran:
* checking CRAN
On 13-10-25 05:21 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:39 PM, John Chambers
wrote:
One additional point to Michael's summary:
The "methods" package itself should stay in Depends:, to be safe.
It would be nice to have more detail about when this is necessary,
rather than s
The old convention was that it went in the exec/ directory, but as you
can see at
http://cran.at.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Non_002dR-scripts-in-packages
it can be in inst/anyName/. A minor convenience of exec/ is that the
directory has the same name in source and when insta
On 13-10-31 03:01 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 31/10/2013 00:40, Paul Gilbert wrote:
The old convention was that it went in the exec/ directory, but as you
can see at
http://cran.at.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Non_002dR-scripts-in-packages
it can be in inst/anyName/. A
On 13-10-31 01:16 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 31/10/2013 15:33, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 13-10-31 03:01 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 31/10/2013 00:40, Paul Gilbert wrote:
The old convention was that it went in the exec/ directory, but as you
can see at
http://cran.at.r-project.org
pathto/python /pathto/python_version.py",intern=TRUE) call and
post-process the one-line text output.
--j
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Paul Gilbert mailto:pgilbert...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 13-10-31 01 :16 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 31/10/2013 15:33, Paul Gilbert
Would "Suggests" not work in this situation? I don't understand why you
would need Depends. In what sense do you rely on the data only package?
Paul
On 13-12-06 04:20 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Hi all,
What should you do when you rely on a data only package. If you just
"Depend" on it, you get
o put the data that is used
to calculate the prior into another package, because it will be larger
than the code, and it does not change that often.
Gabor
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Would "Suggests" not work in this situation? I don't understand why you
wo
On 13-12-07 01:47 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 13-12-07 12:19 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
I don't know about this particular case, but in general it makes sense
to rely on a data package. E.g. I am creating a package that does
Bay
On 13-12-07 05:21 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
The Writing R Extensions manual says that Suggests is for packages which
are required only for examples, which I believe matches Hadley's original
question.
Yes, but without this package they won't be able to run the majority
of examples, which I th
When checking a package I am getting
* checking package dependencies ... NOTE
No repository set, so cyclic dependency check skipped
How/where do I set the repository so I don't get this note?
No doubt this is explained in Writing R Extension, but I have not found it.
Paul
__
On 01/26/2014 12:31 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 26.01.2014 17:52, Paul Gilbert wrote:
When checking a package I am getting
* checking package dependencies ... NOTE
No repository set, so cyclic dependency check skipped
How/where do I set the repository so I don't get this note?
On 03/22/2014 01:32 PM, Radford Neal wrote:
From: Philippe GROSJEAN
... for latest CRAN version, we have successfully installed 4999
packages among the 5321 CRAN package on our platform. ... It is
strange that a large portion of R CMD check errors on CRAN occur and
disappear *without any vers
On 03/26/2014 04:58 AM, Kirill Müller wrote:
Dear list
It is possible to store expected output for tests and examples. From the
manual: "If tests has a subdirectory Examples containing a file
pkg-Ex.Rout.save, this is compared to the output file for running the
examples when the latter are ch
On 04/11/2014 01:43 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
Greg,
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Gregory R. Warnes
wrote:
Hi All,
I see this in the NEWS for R 3.1.0:
type.convert() (and hence by default read.table()) returns a
character vector or factor when representing a numeric input as a
double would
On 04/10/2014 04:34 AM, Kirill Müller wrote:
On 03/26/2014 06:46 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 03/26/2014 04:58 AM, Kirill Müller wrote:
Dear list
It is possible to store expected output for tests and examples. From the
manual: "If tests has a subdirectory Examples containing a fil
On 04/17/2014 02:21 PM, Murray Stokely wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:42 AM, McGehee, Robert
wrote:
Here's my use case: I have a function that pulls arbitrary
financial data from a web service call such as a stock's industry,
price, volume, etc. by reading the web output as a text table. Th
On 06/02/2014 12:16 AM, Gabriel Becker wrote:
Carl,
I don't really have a horse in this race other than a strong feeling that
whatever check does should be mandatory.
That having been said, I think it can be argued that the fact that check
does this means that it IS in the R package vignette
(Please correct me if I'm wrong. I thought I mostly understood this,
finally, but I've made the mistake of thinking I understood something
too many times before.)
On 08/28/2014 10:39 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:01 PM, Gavin Simpson
wrote:
On 27 August 2014 15:24, Hadley
On 09/10/2014 06:12 AM, Kirill Müller wrote:
If you don't intend to keep the old business logic in the long run,
perhaps a version control system such as Git can help you. If you use it
in single-user mode, you can think of it as a backup system where you
manually create each snapshot and give
I am trying to follow directions at
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-exts.html#Suggested-packages
regarding handling suggested packages with requireNamespace() rather
than require(), and I have some questions.
1/ When I do requireNamespace() in a function is the loading of t
I am trying to decide on a name for a directory where I will put some
extra package tests. The main motivation for this is the need to limit
the package test time on CRAN. That is, these are tests that could be in
the tests/ directory and could be run on CRAN, but will take longer than
CRAN lik
I certainly have longer argument lists with no problem. More likely the
Rd file needs special consideration for %.
Paul
On 11/12/2014 02:11 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
I am getting failure of build and check, for an Rd file that has a long
argument list.
Guess diagnosis: a quoted stri
You might also consider starting your vignettes with
\begin{Scode}{echo=FALSE,results=hide}
options(continue=" ")
\end{Scode}
Then you get one prompt but it is still easy to cut and paste. This has
been in many of my packages for many years, so I think it would be fair
to assume it is accept
Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by
default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet.
If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the Internet is not
available, but may not be tested in cases when I would like to know
about the
they
decided to do that sometimes?
Paul
Hope this helps.
Spencer
On 11/26/2014 10:45 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run
by default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the
Internet. If I wrap them
On 14-11-26 05:49 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 26/11/2014, 1:45 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by
default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet.
If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the
In the documentation the closed thing I see to an explanation of this is
that ?detach says "Unloading some namespaces has undesirable side effects"
Can anyone explain why unloading tseries will load zoo? I don't think
this behavior is specific to tseries, it's just an example. I realize
one wo
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
