more consistent (and would be more
convenient for me -- the error-instead-of-warning
is making me have to jump through additional hoops)
if dgamma just returned NaN and a warning.
Any thoughts?
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailin
eta checking is
that I like to keep using the same version of R as my classes
are currently using, and I haven't yet gone to the trouble of
maintaining different versions on my system.
[did anyone have any thoughts on my 4 Nov query about
errors vs warnings in dgamma?]
cheers
thanks. would you like a patch?
(seems easy enough but I thought I'd offer)
looks like library/stats/R/distn.R and
nmath/rgamma.c need fixing; looks like
qgamma may not check for scale<0 in C
code either ...
Ben Bolker
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Ben B
semicolon is.)
Temperatures are decreased according to the
logarithmic cooling schedule as given in Belisle (1992, p. 890);
specifically, the temperature is set to
\code{temp/(log((t-1) %/%tmax)*tmax+exp(1))},
where \code{t} is the current iteration step.
sincerely
Ben Bolker
than my slogging through
one case at a time ...
apologies for the long message, but I am temporarily cut
off from any way to post these files to the web.
cheers
Ben Bolker
code that tests various combinations of numbers of parameters
and algorithms:
---
resmat = array(dim=c(3,2,3
)) produce?
I couldn't find the answer documented anywhere.
(And how about sum(numeric(0))==0,
which for some reason makes more intuitive sense
to me, but is really exactly the same thing --
consider exp(sum(log(numeric(0 ... ?)
cheers
Ben Bolker
--
620B Bartram
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 1/8/2006 9:24 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>>It surprised me that prod(numeric(0)) is 1.
>> I guess if you say (operation(nothing) == identity
>> element) this makes sense, but ??
>
>
> What value were you expecting, or were you expe
Tony Plate acm.org> writes:
>
> Since the virtue and reliability of Wikis was brought up, I created a R
> Wiki page for this at
>
http://www.sciviews.org/_rgui/wiki/doku.php?id=beginners:surprises:emptysetfuncs
>
>
> Anyone: please correct errors and improve it!
>
> Tony Plate
>
O
being an idiot ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
---
rm(list=ls())
npts=10
set.seed(1001)
a =2
b =0.5
x= runif(npts)
y = a*x/(1+a*b*x)+rnorm(npts,sd=0.2)
gfun <- function(a,b,x) {
if (a<0 || b<0) stop("bounds violated")
a*x/(1+a*b*x)
}
m1 = nls(y~gfun(a,b,x
) function (i.e., manually recreating an image()
by drawing colored squares, but transforming each of the to the 3D
perspective). If the former, you might be able to do something with
the pixmap package ...
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Spencer Graves pdf.com> writes:
>
> Hi, Ben, et al.:
>
> The issue Ben identified with confint(nls(... )) generates a hard
> failure for me.
"We" (being Brian Ripley and I) know about this already.
I'm sorry I failed to specify enough info in my bug report,
but I was using R-dev
PR #7690 points out that if the confidence intervals (+/-1.58
IQR/sqrt(n)) in a boxplot with notch=TRUE are larger than the
hinges -- which is most likely to happen for small n and asymmetric
distributions -- the resulting plot is ugly, e.g.:
set.seed(1001)
npts <- 5
X <- rnorm(2*npts,rep(3:4
I was sitting in the coffee room at work listening to people complain
about a recent seminar about nanotechnology using the terms
nanofluidics, nanofactory, nano-this, and nano-that ... I found myself
thinking "well the speaker should just
have said
with(nano,
...)
Un(?)fortunate
ing, or is there a sensible use case for incomplete recycling?
Ll. 546ff of main/src/subscript.c suggest that there is a place in the
code where we already know if incomplete recycling has happened ...
Thoughts?
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-projec
, Berry, Charles wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 11:56 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry if this has been covered here somewhere in the past, but ...
>>
>> Does anyone know why logical vectors are *silently* recycled, even
>> when they are incommens
PS I'm tempted to insert a warning at this point and see how often it
actually gets triggered ...
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> Chuck: I don't see how this example represents
> incomplete/incommensurate recycling. Doesn't TRUE replicate
and floating-point computations give
different answers??? these values are going to get sent to qr.solve() a
few lines later in any case ...)
If people think this is worthwhile I could submit a bug report.
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mail
tl;dr is the R bug tracker down or am I being an idiot? Help please ...
I decided I would follow up on
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2018-January/075410.html
(reporting/suggesting a patch for an issue in stats::mantelhaen.test()
with large data sets)
Reading the instructions
color and clarity are ordered factors, so sparse.model.matrix is
generating orthogonal-polynomial contrasts (see ?contr.poly). This is
by design ... what are you trying to do? Are you interested in fac2sparse?
On 18-02-07 11:00 PM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Sometimes, sparse.mo
I knew I had seen this before but couldn't previously remember where.
https://github.com/lme4/lme4/issues/441 ... I initially fixed with
gsub(), but (pushed by Martin Maechler to do better) I eventually
fixed it by storing the original names of the model frame (without
backticks) as an attribute fo
; Extrapolating: every R package that tries to examine formulas and partition
> them into bits
> needs its own terms function? This does not look like a good solution to
> me.
>
> On 03/07/2018 07:39 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>> I knew I had seen this before but couldn
On 18-03-08 10:07 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Ben Bolker
>>>>>> on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:42:40 -0500 writes:
>
> > Meant to respond to this but forgot.
> > I didn't write a new terms() function -- I added an attribute to t
tors attributes
> of the terms() structure, and all of those have the backticks. I know
> the second two will currently break the coxme and survival packages, I
> haven't chased down the effect on the first.
>
>
> On 03/08/2018 08:42 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>> Meant to respond
patch against recent SVN ...
as far as I can tell this trivial typo has been there for 20 years:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/blame/ba7920a99fb2fb62b89e404e65f8b132ed4c150a/src/library/base/man/pretty.Rd
===
--- pretty.Rd (r
Does anyone have comments on the new wording here?
Suggested:
The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
(xxx)
In title case this would be:
(Xxx)
Hoping R core will see this here and magically adopt it, otherwise
I'll try posting it to the r bugs site ...
===
Any follow-up/comments on this? If I don't hear back I'll submit to
r-bugs so it doesn't get lost ...
(Don't see any changes in QC.R in the last few days ...
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commits/trunk/src/library/tools/R/QC.R
)
-- Forwarded message ------
Fr
g-likelihood and converts it
back to an AIC (!)
* family()$dev.resid() computes the squared deviance residuals
* stats:::residuals.glm retrieves these values and takes the signed
square root
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org ma
ds to set a starting value for the next fit
+# need to set a starting value for the next fit
glm(y ~ x, family = quasi(variance = "mu(1-mu)", link = "logit"),
start = c(0,1))
}
\keyword{models}
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>>>>&g
Reasonably easy to avoid, but maybe an edge case that should be
handled? Haven't looked yet to see how easy it would be to fix ... Am I
missing something?
> library(Matrix)
> m <- Matrix(0,nrow=3,ncol=3)
> m
3 x 3 sparse Matrix of class "dsCMatrix"
[1,] . . .
[2,] . . .
[3,] . . .
> image(m)
Ben Bolker
===
--- mtcars.Rd (revision 75186)
+++ mtcars.Rd (working copy)
@@ -35,6 +35,14 @@
Building multiple regression models interactively.
\emph{Biometrics}, \bold{37}, 391--411.
}
+\details{
+Henderson and Velleman
On 2018-09-19 09:40 AM, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 13:43, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
>> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce
>> older results.
>
>
> I'm a b
A quick point of order here: arguing with Duncan in this forum is
helpful to expose ideas, but probably neither side will convince the
other; eventually, if you want this adopted in core R, you'll need to
convince an R-core member to pursue this fix.
In the meantime, a good, well-tested impl
on. Currently the ‘"internal"’,
‘"wininet"’ and ‘"libcurl"’ methods will remove the file if there
the URL is unavailable except when ‘mode’ specifies appending when
the file should be unchanged.
Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/293
ubmit this as a bug report if that's recommended ...
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
"vector[s]" should be plural in line 54 ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
Index: ts.Rd
===
--- ts.Rd (revision 75540)
+++ ts.Rd (working copy)
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
}
\details{
The function \code{ts} is used
I don't know whether this helps or not, but using residuals(fit) rather
than fit$residuals returns 0 for the last value. This is different from
(predict(fit,type="response")[25] - Y[25]) (or the equivalent Pearson
residual) because the *weighted* residuals are returned by definition
(not that I
FWIW I've been reasonably happy with the revdepcheck package: it's not
base-R, but it's pretty robust (lme4 'only' has 286 dependencies to
check ...) I've had much better luck running it on a remote server
(where the sysadmin is responsive so it's not too much trouble to get
extra system depen
I do think it's plausible to expect that we could get *non-decreasing*
results.
I get
any(diff(exp(ppois(0:19, lambda=0.9, log.p=TRUE)))<0)
as FALSE.
But I do get diff(ppois(18:19, lambda=0.9)) < 0.
Looking at the code of ppois, it's just (within C code) calling pgamma
with pgamma(lambda,
Line 23:
"In theory up they can to"
should be
"In theory they can be up to"
or (slightly more formally)
"In theory they can contain up to"
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://s
Agree. Or just create the data frame with those variables in it
directly ...
On 2018-12-13 3:26 p.m., Thomas Yee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> something that has been on my mind for a decade or two has
> been the examples for lm() and glm(). They encourage poor style
> because of mismanagement of data
There seem to be a variety of opinions about style in this case; do
you omit the apostrophe ("NAs") because it's not a possessive or a
contraction, or do you include the apostrophe ("NA's") to clearly
distinguish the acronym from the plural form?
I personally prefer "NAs" to "NA's" but both are d
ary/base/R/attach@2 |
grep objects
I had a quick look at the Becker & Chambers brown book (1984) and
Becker and Wilks blue book (1988) on Google books and could find ls but
not objects() ... ?
Anyone happen to know?
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
at least once.
Is there a publicly accessible SVN server for recommended packages (in
general) and nlme (in particular) anywhere?
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Silence on this so far? Trying here one more time, otherwise I'll
submit it as a bug report ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2019-01-17 12:32 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
> tl;dr anova.lme() claims to provide sums of squares, but it doesn't. And
> some names are misspelled in ?lme.
Here are relevant patches to address the various issues described
below. Thanks for the SVN info!
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2019-01-21 4:54 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Ben Bolker
>>>>>> on Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:32:20 -0500 writes:
>
>
remotes has fewer dependencies. I believe that the current version of
devtools just re-exports install_github etc. from the remotes package.
On 2019-02-02 11:31 a.m., David Lindelof wrote:
> I see some value in Duncan’s proposal to implement this as an extra package
> instead of a change to b
This SO question may be of interest:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38589705/difference-between-rs-sum-and-armadillos-accu/
which points out that sum() isn't doing anything fancy *except* using
extended-precision registers when available. (Using Kahan's algorithm
does come at a computat
as
a slightly more flexible and robust version of stats4::mle(); I don't
remember/can't promise that it handles fits with singular Hessians, but
I'm guessing it does ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2019-02-19 12:02 p.m., Francisco Matorras wrote:
> Hi, R developers.
> when running m
properly ...
Thoughts? Should I submit this as a bug report/patch?
cheers
Ben Bolker
Index: src/library/stats/R/models.R
===
--- src/library/stats/R/models.R (revision 76140)
+++ src/library/stats/R/models.R (working copy)
@
n such as
> contrasts.arg-"contr.sum", but I don't see a bug here.
I agree. That's what my patch does (throws a warning message if
contrasts.arg is non-NULL and not a list).
cheers
Ben Bolker
>
> Best,
> John
>
>
Specifically: https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/main/summary.c
And if you don't want to deal with Subversion, you can look at the
read-only github mirror:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/e5b21d0397c607883ff25cca379687b86933d730/src/main/summary.c#L115-L131
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:57
ame) can be an element of the contrasts.arg list.
>
> > Best, John
>
> Thank you John for the clarification and the reminder about
> filling the omission there!
>
> Prepared to go (into the sources) now.
> Martin
>
>
> >> -Original Message- From: Ma
uot;shQuotee"')
The new line reads:
res <- system2(qpdf, c(qpdf_flags, shQuote(p), shQuotee(tf)),
FALSE, FALSE)
see:
svn diff -r76237:76236 src/library/tools/R/admin.R
Seems like a straight-up typo?
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R
PS there's also a "shQoute(tf2)" on line 1063 that will presumably also
cause trouble at some point ...
On 2019-03-14 3:57 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
> It looks like the most recent SVN commit changed line 1068 of
> src/library/tools/R/admin.R to include a call to "s
-requests-to-the-r-core-team
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2019-03-26 4:20 p.m., Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On di, 26 mrt 2019 12:48:12 -0700, Michael Lawrence wrote:
>>Please file a bug on bugzilla so we can discuss this further.
>
> All fine.
> I didn't find a way to crea
nce) thinks this is
worth looking at is very encouraging (and somewhat unusual for
feature/enhancement suggestions)!
Ben Bolker
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 5:29 PM Michael Lawrence via R-devel
wrote:
>
> This has some nice properties:
>
> 1) It self-documents the input expectations in
I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples,
which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise
'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols)
can be handled by protecting them with backticks (``)
## using non-syntactic names:
refo
Proposed patch (I think .txt files work OK as attachments to the list?)
On 2019-04-04 2:21 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Ben Bolker
>>>>>> on Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:34:50 -0400 writes:
>
> > I suspect that the issue is addressed (ob
cussed there, if you want to purseu this ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2019-04-18 7:30 a.m., Saren Tasciyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for writing this late, I was very busy. I started this discussion
> here. I wish I could write to bugs.r-project.org, but I don't have an
> account
This happens to me, too, on an Ubuntu virtual machine (with a "vboxsf"
file system, over an underlying MacOS (HFS) file system), but only when
installing as part of R CMD check ... I did find the workaround, so I
don't think I reported it before.
On 2019-05-04 10:35 p.m., Henrik Bengtsson wrot
That's consistent/not surprising if the problem lies in the numerical
gradient calculation step ...
On 2019-05-06 10:06 a.m., Ravi Varadhan wrote:
> Optim's Nelder-Mead works correctly for this example.
>
>
>> optim(par=10, fn=fn, method="Nelder-Mead")
> x=10, ret=100.02 (memory)
> x=11, ret
I agree with many the sentiments about the wisdom of computing very
small p-values (although the example below may win some kind of a prize:
I've seen people talking about p-values of the order of 10^(-2000), but
never 10^(-(10^8)) !). That said, there are a several tricks for
getting more rea
My colleague points out that these typos are probably still present
because almost no-one has the stamina to read that far down in ?switch ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
Index: switch.Rd
===
--- switch.Rd (revision 76766
Does setting message=FALSE in the chunk options of the vignette help?
Or less preferably, using supressMessages() ?
On 2019-07-23 9:36 a.m., Lenth, Russell V wrote:
> Lionel,
>
> Thanks for your response. I understand that method overriding can be a
> serious issue, but as you say, this i
Creeping code complexity ...
I like to think that the cuteR names will have a Darwinian
disadvantage in the long run. FWIW Hadley Wickham argues (rightly, I
think) against mixed-case names:
http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/package.html#naming. I too am guilty of picking
mixed-case package names in th
Ugh, but not *as* ambiguous as the proposed example (you can still
split unambiguously on "_"; yes, you could split on "last _" in
Gabriel's example, but ...)
On 2019-08-09 4:17 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 09/08/2019 2:41 p.m., Gabriel Becker wrote:
>> Note that this proposal would make my
ng call to statmod::rinvgauss ? Would a patch be considered?
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On 2019-09-25 3:26 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Ben Bolker
>>>>>> on Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:09:55 -0400 writes:
>
> > SuppDists is orphaned on CRAN (and has been since 2013).
> > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_
Your second issue seems like a more or less unavoidable floating-point
computation issue. The paired test operates by computing differences
between corresponding values of x and y.
It's not impossible to try to detect "almost-ties" (by testing for
differences less than, say, sqrt(.Machine$do
From R NEWS (changes in 3.6.0)
Experimentally, setting environment variable _R_CHECK_LENGTH_1_LOGIC2_
will lead to warnings (or errors if the variable is set to a ‘true’
value) when && or || encounter and use arguments of length more than one.
On 2020-01-13 11:46 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D.
Ugh, sounds like competing priorities.
* maintain type consistency
* minimize storage (= current version, since 3.0.0)
* maximize utility for large lambda (= proposed change)
* keep user interface, and code, simple (e.g., it would be easy enough
to add a switch that provided user contro
Because it's the fifth recurrence of the date (29 February).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirates_of_Penzance
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:32 PM Abby Spurdle wrote:
>
> Congratulations!
>
> > celebrate (beeR=TRUE, loud.music=FALSE,
> nbeeRs=2L,
> proportion.of.tech.talk=0.4)
>
> Why
Attn: someone on R-core:
"ran" should be "can".
Also, thanks for this feature!
Index: Quotes.Rd
===
--- Quotes.Rd (revision 77845)
+++ Quotes.Rd (working copy)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
Raw character constants are also availa
In the long run, coming up with a way to parse specials in formulas
that is both clean and robust is a good idea - annoying users are a
little bit like CRAN maintainers in this respect. I think I would
probably do this by testing identical(eval(extracted_head),
survival::Surv) - but this has lots o
I think Robin knows about FAQ 7.31/floating point (author of
'Brobdingnag', among other numerical packages). I agree that this is
surprising (to me).
To reframe this question: is there way to get an *exact* ASCII
representation of a numeric value (i.e., guaranteeing the restored value
is ide
.
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2020-03-03 4:02 p.m., Gabriel Becker wrote:
> Hi Terry,
>
> http://win-builder.r-project.org/ and the rhub build service (which can be
> invoked by the rhub package) allow on demand checks in windows
> environments, though for active debugging the iterat
orrections, pointers to further documentation, etc. would be
most welcome ... Web searching for this stuff hasn't gotten me very far,
and it seems to be deeper than most of the introductory material I can
find (including the Rcpp vignettes) ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
re a way I can use Shield() since this an Rcpp-based project
anyway?
Sorry for all the very basic questions, but I'm flying nearly blind
here ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2020-03-23 4:01 p.m., Tomas Kalibera wrote:
> On 3/23/20 8:39 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>> Dear r-devel folk
I've discovered an infelicity (I guess) in qbeta(): it's not a bug,
since there's a clear warning about lack of convergence of the numerical
algorithm ("full precision may not have been achieved"). I can work
around this, but I'm curious why it happens and whether there's a better
workaround -
On 2020-03-26 4:02 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Ben Bolker
>>>>>> on Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:09:16 -0400 writes:
>
> > I've discovered an infelicity (I guess) in qbeta(): it's not a bug,
> > since there
Does anyone have any idea how hard it would be/where to start if one
wanted to hack/patch R to allow X11 graphics windows that had keyboard
focus to be closed with standard keyboard shortcuts (e.g. Ctrl-W to
close on Linux)? Has this been suggested/tried before?
cheers
Ben
Laurent gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dear R-developpers,
>
> The file NEWS disappeared in r5243, and the authoritative source of
> information for what has changed in R is in ./doc/NEWS.Rd.
>
> A quick glance at NEWS was extremely helpful for knowing what has
> changed, and whether building a (mor
ost of the time ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
--
Ben Bolker
bbol...@gmail.com , bol...@mcmaster.ca
http://www.math.mcmaster.ca/~bolker
GPG key: http://www.math.mcmaster.ca/~bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://st
Paul Johnson gmail.com> writes:
>
[snip: lots more snippage to try get gmane to let me post]
> What do you think of this: The priority is to put the most important
> thing at the top. The second priority is brevity.
I really like this.
Some suggestions:
=
> Posti
one who had
been happily using the code without looking at the docs would see a
sudden change in the results ...
This is in nlme 3.1-96, from a fresh tools/rsync-recommended. Sending it
to r-devel for comment because r-core is listed as the maintainer.
sincerely
Ben Bolker
Janko Thyson ku-eichstaett.de> writes:
>
> Dear List,
>
> I'd like to set up a package repository so I can use install.packages() on
> it for home-grown packages. I set up an AMPP infrastructure on a windows box
> already, but I'm pretty lost with respect to what to do next as I didn't do
> any
anyone have a status report on r-forge ... ?
From here (Hamilton, ON) I can't ping ...
PING r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at (137.208.57.38) 56(84) bytes of data.
cheers
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/ma
ctor, it hurts
when I do this"; "well then, don't do that!") sort of situation.
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Ben Bolker gmail.com> writes:
>
> ija.csic.es> writes:
>
> >
> > Thanks. Yes, quote="" solves the problem.
> >
> > I would never say, however, from the documentations, that this was causing
> > the duplicate records. Rather, I wou
Ben Bolker gmail.com> writes:
>
>
Can simplify this still farther:
a b'c
d e'f
g h'i
> One of the first things that happens in read.table is that
> the first few lines are read with readTableHead:
>
> lines <- .Internal(r
Ben Bolker gmail.com> writes:
>
> Ben Bolker gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> >
>
>Can simplify this still farther:
>
> a b'c
> d e'f
> g h'i
This example file leads to duplicate lines.
Arguably it should have behavior analogo
Index: system.Rd
===
--- system.Rd (revision 53611)
+++ system.Rd (working copy)
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
\item The most important difference is that on a Unix-alike
\code{system} launches a shell which then runs \code{command
, at least hundreds of data points.)
If that doesn't work, please try your question again on R-help.
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
UN = "paste", sep = name_sep)
}
which could still break existing code in the unlikely event
that someone used a value of FUN with a 'name_sep' argument (much
less likely). Perhaps the argument could be named .sep -- that
seems to be a standard convention in these cases for trying to
avoid previous/user-defined argument names.
For whatever it's worth this seems like a good idea to me -- a
small change that will increase flexibility with little cost.
Ben Bolker
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Ravi Varadhan jhmi.edu> writes:
>
> "The decision about whether it belongs in a package or in base R is
> about who should maintain the code."
>
> Ok. I understand it now.
>
> Thanks,
> Ravi.
>
A point that may not have been made (sorry if it was and I missed it):
A better question m
Jari Oksanen oulu.fi> writes:
>
> Hello R Developers,
>
> Dear R-developers,
>
> I ran some standard tests with currently (today morning) compiled R release
> candidate in Linux R 2.12.1 RC (2010-12-13 r53843). Some of these tests used
> plot.TukeyHSD function. This worked OK on the screen (X
On 10-12-14 01:16 PM, Peter Ehlers wrote:
> On 2010-12-14 09:27, Ben Bolker wrote:
>> Jari Oksanen oulu.fi> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello R Developers,
>>>
>>> Dear R-developers,
>>>
>>> I ran some standard tests with currently (
ed; line widths less
+ than 0.01 will be set equal to this minimum value. Line dashes
+ are set proportional to line width; dash patterns less than 0.01
+ will be set to solid. \code{pch="."} with
\code{cex = 1} corresponds to a square of side 1/72 inch, which is
also the \
-12-14 12:13:32.0 +0200
> @@ -172,5 +172,5 @@
> 0 setgray
> 0.00 setlinewidth
> -[ 3.00 5.00] 0 setdash
> +[ 0.00 0.00] 0 setdash
> np
> 660.06 91.44 m
>
> So 0.00 setlinewidth worked, but [0.00 0.00] 0 setdash failed. Assuming
> PostScript is anything like En
on line 1714 of R-lang.texi (current SVN of R-devel, 53919)
@code{x$aa} will match @code{x$aabb} if @code{x} does not a component
should probably have "contain" or "have" inserted after "not"
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.eth
1 - 100 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
