My colleague points out that these typos are probably still present
because almost no-one has the stamina to read that far down in ?switch ...
cheers
Ben Bolker
Index: switch.Rd
===================================================================
--- switch.Rd (revision 76766)
+++ switch.Rd (working copy)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
in which case the next non-missing element is evaluated, so for
example \code{switch("cc", a = 1, cc =, cd =, d = 2)} evaluates to
\code{2}. If there is more than one match, the first matching element
- is used. In the case of no match, if there is a unnamed element of
+ is used. In the case of no match, if there is an unnamed element of
\code{\dots} its value is returned. (If there is more than one such
argument an error is signaled.)
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
The first argument is always taken to be \code{EXPR}: if it is named
its name must (partially) match.
- A warning is signaled if no alternatives are provides, as this is
+ A warning is signaled if no alternatives are provided, as this is
usually a coding error.
This is implemented as a \link{primitive} function that only evaluates
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
