> Emil Bodeon Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:04:29 + writes:
> I found some strange behaviour, which I think is a bug.
> Could someone make an account for me on Bugzilla or
> pass on my report?
I did create a bugzilla account for you (you should've got the
automatic e-mail in the me
Yes, both are rooted in age-old design infelicities (in which, basically,
interactive expedience has taken precedence over consistency and generality).
Unfortunately, they are quite difficult to rectify, because there are bound to
be countless uses of, say, diag(5) as a 5x5 identity matrix whic
Some languages that recognized early design mistakes introduced a
strict mode, which applies to a local context, and enforces a safer,
more consistent API. This is a pragmatic solution, as it does not
require any changes to existing code, but still allows writing better
code in the future.
Impleme
Dear all,
I tried to read in a 3.8Gb RDS file on a computer with 16Gb available
memory. To my astonishment, the memory footprint of R rises quickly to over
13Gb and the attempt ends with an error that says "cannot allocate vector
of size 5.8Gb".
I would expect that 3 times the memory would be eno
Your RDS file is likely compressed, and could have compression of 10x
or more depending on the composition of the data that is in it and the
compression method used. 'gzip' compression is used by default.
--
Brian G. Peterson
http://braverock.com/brian/
Ph: 773-459-4973
IM: bgpbraverock
On Tue,
The ratio of object size to rds file size depends on the object. Some
variation is due to how header information is stored in memory and in the
file but I suspect most is due to how compression works (e.g., a vector of
repeated values can be compressed into a smaller file than a bunch of
random by
Thx William and Brian for your swift responses, very insightful. I'll have
to hunt for more memory.
Cheers
Joris
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:16 PM William Dunlap wrote:
> The ratio of object size to rds file size depends on the object. Some
> variation is due to how header information is stored
Dear R-devs,
Scenario:
When checking a package via `R CMD check package_tar.ball`, required /
suggested packages may be missing. R subsequently returns a list of packages
that are missing (delimited by spaces).
Example:
```
R CMD check glmSparseNet_0.99.13.tar.gz
* using log directory '/home
On 18/09/2018 2:16 PM, Marcel Ramos wrote:
Dear R-devs,
Scenario:
When checking a package via `R CMD check package_tar.ball`, required /
suggested packages may be missing. R subsequently returns a list of packages
that are missing (delimited by spaces).
Example:
```
R CMD check glmSparseNe
Thanks for the report (and the bug report).
I need to make time to have a closer look at this.
Paul
On 14/09/18 14:03, brodie gaslam via R-devel wrote:
It appears that the chromatic adaptation feature of `grDevices::convertColor`is
broken, and likely has been for many years. While a little
10 matches
Mail list logo
