Hi All,
This is a very important issue. It would be very sad to leave most users
unaware of a free speedup of this size. These options don't appear in the
R --help output. They really should be added there. Additionally, if the
garbage collector is working very hard, might it emit a note about be
git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git which
some users might decide to use. For those users' surprise, the
repository will always fail to build on svnonly target and it will
exit early.
The problem is simple enough to fix by just checking if a .git
directory exists in top_buil
On 19/01/2015 2:33 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git which
> some users might decide to use. For those users' surprise, the
> repository will always fail to build on svnonly target and it will
> exit early.
>
> The problem is simple enough to fix
I've just recently noticed that using the na.last = NA setting with
order incurs a HUGE performance hit.
It appears that much of order(...) (the R wrapper, not the internal
calls) is written in as general a manner as possible to handle the
large number of input types.
But the canonical case of orde
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:06:11PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 19/01/2015 2:33 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git which
> > some users might decide to use. For those users' surprise, the
> > repository will always fail to build on svnon
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:31:32PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> >>> git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git
> >>> which some users might decide to use. For those users'
> >>> surprise, the repository will always fail to build on svnonly
> >>> target and it will exit ear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 19/01/2015 3:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:06:11PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 19/01/2015 2:33 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git
>>> which some users m
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:31:32PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> >>> git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git
>> >>> which some users might decide to use. For those users'
>> >>> surprise, the repository will alway
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 19/01/2015 3:34 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:31:32PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git
> which some users might decide to use. For those users'
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:44:45PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > git has an interface for cloning SVN repositories into git
> > which some users might decide to use. For those users'
> > surprise, the repository will always fail to build on
> > svnonly target and it will e
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> I just thought that such a small patch which causes no visible change to
> SVN users and allow for git users to build R would be acceptable, but if
> it isn't, that's fine too.
Felipe ---
It would appear that you are unaware that you are wal
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> I just thought that such a small patch which causes no visible change to
>> SVN users and allow for git users to build R would be acceptable, but if
>> it isn't, that's fine too.
>
> Feli
On 19/01/2015 4:13 PM, Nathan Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> I just thought that such a small patch which causes no visible change to
>> SVN users and allow for git users to build R would be acceptable, but if
>> it isn't, that's fine too.
>
> Felipe ---
>
I am not sure where to post this.
I am looking at the NEWS file here:
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/NEWS.R-3.1.2.html
And the links at the bottom seem to be broken.
This link:
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/NEWS.2
Should be this:
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/NEWS.2
On 19 January 2015 at 17:11, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| The people who would have to maintain the patch can't test it.
I don't understand this.
The patch, as we may want to recall, was all of
+GIT := $(shell if [ -d "$(top_builddir)/.git" ]; then \
+echo "git"; fi)
+
and
-
Fellipe,
CXXR development has moved to github, and we haven't fixed up the build for
using git yet. Could you send a pull request with your change to the repo
at https://github.com/cxxr-devel/cxxr/?
Also, this patch may be useful for pqR too.
https://github.com/radfordneal/pqR
Thanks
On Mon, J
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:33:15PM -0800, Karl Millar wrote:
> Felipe,
>
> CXXR development has moved to github, and we haven't fixed up the build for
> using git yet. Could you send a pull request with your change to the repo
> atÂ
> https://github.com/cxxr-devel/cxxr/?
>
> Also, this p
17 matches
Mail list logo
