I am compiling the latest R-patched (Revision: 65533) Ubuntu Lucid (10.04).
Building succeeds but make check stops with an error.
The output in the terminal from make check:
Testing examples for package ‘base’
Testing examples for package ‘tools’
Error: testing 'tools' failed
Execution halted
m
> Berend Hasselman
> on Wed, 7 May 2014 09:24:46 +0200 writes:
> I am compiling the latest R-patched (Revision: 65533) Ubuntu Lucid
(10.04).
> Building succeeds but make check stops with an error.
> The output in the terminal from make check:
> Testing examples for
On 07-05-2014, at 11:23, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Berend Hasselman
>>on Wed, 7 May 2014 09:24:46 +0200 writes:
>
>> I am compiling the latest R-patched (Revision: 65533) Ubuntu Lucid (10.04).
>
>> Building succeeds but make check stops with an error.
>> The output in the terminal
Hadley asked about the Blue book; my shelf still has the earlier brown book
Becker and Chambers, 1984, S: An interactive environment for data analysis
and graphics.
The manual page for precedence is
$ component select
%x special operator
- unary minus
Where does the value 2.2e-16 come from in p-values for chisq tests such
as those
reported below?
> Anova(cm.mod2)
Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II tests)
Response: Freq
LR Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
B 11026.2 1 < 2.2e-16 ***
W 7037.5 1 < 2.2e-16 ***
Age 886.6 8 < 2.2e-16 ***
B:W 3025.2 1 < 2.2e-16
Presumably from
> .Machine$double.eps
[1] 2.220446e-16
Whether this means the tail probability is actually that
small, or that the routine that computes it can't get
any more accuracy than that, you'll have to dig deeper.
John
..
John
See ?format.pval
cheers, jari oksanen
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf
of Michael Friendly [frien...@yorku.ca]
Sent: 07 May 2014 17:02
To: r-devel
Subject: [Rd] historical significance of Pr(>Chisq) < 2.2e-16
W
On Wed, 7 May 2014, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
Hadley asked about the Blue book; my shelf still has the earlier brown book
Becker and Chambers, 1984, S: An interactive environment for data analysis
and graphics.
The manual page for precedence is
$ component select
%x
On 5/7/14, 5:21 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
Hadley asked about the Blue book; my shelf still has the earlier brown book
Becker and Chambers, 1984, S: An interactive environment for data
analysis and graphics.
Historically interesting, but there was never a guarantee that Version 3
May I request a modest change in the documentation and warning
for "xinch", "yinch", and "xyinch"?
Consider the following example:
> plot(1:2, log='y')
> yinch(1)
[1] 0.1961134
Warning message:
In yinch(1) : y log scale: yinch() is nonsense
In fact, in this environment, "
"Equivalence" certainly does not mean that literally replacing some text will
not change the result.
>From "R language definition", p. 11:
> Except for the syntax, there is no difference between applying an operator
> and calling a
function. In fact, x + y can equivalently be written ‘+‘(x, y)
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
Sorry I couldn't resist ;-)
H.
On 05/07/2014 09:16 AM, John Chambers wrote:
On 5/7/14, 5:21 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
Hadley asked about the Blue book; my shelf still has the
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> No big deal. These things can be tricky:
>
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
>
> Sorry I couldn't resist ;-)
>
Yeah, but that's just yet another trip down the rabbit hole - why is -2 parsed
as `-`(2) and not a s
It may come a time before the pchisq() function had the lower.tail
argument. In those days you had the compute the upper tail as
1-pchisq(x2, df). For any eps<2.2e-16 (.Machine$double.eps), 1-eps==1
so 1-(1-eps)==0 so you would get, e.g.,
> 1-pchisq(100,2)
[1] 0
and people would say 'but the
On 07 May 2014, at 21:52 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
> On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>
>> No big deal. These things can be tricky:
>>
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
>>
>> Sorry I couldn't resist ;-)
>>
>
> Yeah, but that's just yet another tr
On 05/07/2014 12:52 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
Sorry I couldn't resist ;-)
Yeah, but that's just yet another trip down the rabbit hole - wh
On 05/07/2014 02:01 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 07 May 2014, at 21:52 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
Sorry I couldn't resist ;-)
Yeah, but t
On May 7, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 12:52 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>> On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>
>>> No big deal. These things can be tricky:
>>>
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
>>>
>>> Sorry I couldn't res
On May 7, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 02:01 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>> On 07 May 2014, at 21:52 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>>> On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>>
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://stat.ethz.ch/piperm
On 07/05/2014, 5:55 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 05/07/2014 02:01 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 07 May 2014, at 21:52 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://st
On 05/07/2014 02:55 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 05/07/2014 02:01 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 07 May 2014, at 21:52 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://
On 05/07/2014 02:45 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 05/07/2014 12:52 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.html
On 05/07/2014 02:45 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 05/07/2014 12:52 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
No big deal. These things can be tricky:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-January/036022.ht
I am trying to update an unsupported package and got the warning:
* checking dependencies in R code ... WARNING
'library' or 'require' calls not declared from: 'Hmisc' 'R2HTML' 'tcltk'
Missing or unexported object: 'utils::.win32consoleCompletion'
See the information on DESCRIPTION files in the c
Hi Knut,
The code will contain library or require statements, which
do not belong there, but need to replaced by specifying the
dependencies on these packages in the DESCRIPTION file
(Depends / Imports field). For imports you also need to
make sure the NAMESPACE file contains the intended state
On 07/05/2014 21:41, William Dunlap wrote:
It may come a time before the pchisq() function had the lower.tail
argument. In those days you had the compute the upper tail as
1-pchisq(x2, df). For any eps<2.2e-16 (.Machine$double.eps), 1-eps==1
so 1-(1-eps)==0 so you would get, e.g.,
> 1-pchisq
26 matches
Mail list logo
