On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
> wrote:
>> I build from svn daily and I have not had this problem. I build in a
>> tree separate from the source tree.
>>
>> I do think Hin-Tak has a point about clearly specifying tha
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
wrote:
> I build from svn daily and I have not had this problem. I build in a
> tree separate from the source tree.
>
> I do think Hin-Tak has a point about clearly specifying that this is
> how you should do it, in the manual (if that has no
As there has been no response to this ...
Why not simply:
> g <- substitute(f(x),list(f=function(x){x+1})) ## with curly braces
> g
function (x)
{
x + 1
}(x)
> x <- 2
> eval(g)
[1] 3
Cheers,
Bert
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> e.g.
>
> substitute(f(x), list(f = f
Hin-Tak Leung users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>
> --- On Fri, 15/2/13, Simon Urbanek r-project.org> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> >
> > > Look. I don't see this as "my" problem - as far as I am
> > concerned, I have donated my time - and over and over - to
>
On Feb 16, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Roger Bivand wrote:
> Hin-Tak Leung users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>
>>
>> --- On Fri, 15/2/13, Simon Urbanek r-project.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>>>
Look. I don't see this as "my" problem - as far as I am
>>> conc
On 13-02-15 10:45 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
e.g.
substitute(f(x), list(f = function(x) x + 1))
# function (x)
# x + 1(x)
An extra pair of parentheses would really help:
(function(x)
x + 1)(x)
(Better indenting etc would be nice, but not necessary for correct
understand of the code)
This is
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> As there has been no response to this ...
>
> Why not simply:
>
>> g <- substitute(f(x),list(f=function(x){x+1})) ## with curly braces
>> g
> function (x)
> {
> x + 1
> }(x)
>> x <- 2
>> eval(g)
> [1] 3
Thomas Lumley sent me a similar sug
> This is a little tricky for the deparser. It sees a call to a function
> which was determined by an expression. Sometimes you want parens, sometimes
> you don't. For example, if getfun(y) returns a function, it's clearer to
> display a call as getfun(y)(x) than (getfun(y))(x).
>
> I'll see if
> Although it goes a long way, it doesn't always work -- it assumes that the
> directory structure did not change in the project between the revisions -
> distclean may not clean things that have changed since you updated the SVN
> (note that to address that you should run distclean *before* the
R.exe, Rgui.exe, Rcmd.exe and Rscript.exe all support the --help
argument but RSetReg.exe --help ignores the argument and attempts to
set the registry key. Since one might try this as a first attempt to
figure out what the command is all about this seems a bit dangerous.
It would be nice if it res
On 13-02-16 10:19 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
As there has been no response to this ...
Why not simply:
g <- substitute(f(x),list(f=function(x){x+1})) ## with curly braces
g
function (x)
{
x + 1
}(x)
x <- 2
eval(g)
[1] 3
Thomas Lum
On Feb 15, 2013, at 6:13 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> FWIW, extracting snapshot source elsewhere outside svn, run
> "tools/rsync-recommended" then just plain "./configure && make" doesn't work
> either. Nothing to do with building inside checkout nor extra configure
> options.
>
Can you define
Hi,
as said at the end, all comments are now in the light of R 3.x.0 (x > 0).
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13-02-15 1:53 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Duncan,
>>
>> thanks you for your prompt reply.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
On 13-02-16 10:22 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
This is a little tricky for the deparser. It sees a call to a function
which was determined by an expression. Sometimes you want parens, sometimes
you don't. For example, if getfun(y) returns a function, it's clearer to
display a call as getfun(y)(x)
> I suspect it's only when you have a function in the quoted call, not a symbol:
Add a call to 'function' (as opposed to the function made by evaluating that
call)
to your test suite:
> Q <- list(
q1 = quote(getFunction("-")(x)),
q2 = substitute(f(x), list(f = function(x) {-x
15 matches
Mail list logo
