R uses the environment variable R_PAPERSIZE to set its papersize, e.g. for
postscript.
It seems the modern way is to via LC_PAPER, e.g.
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2002-05/msg00010.html
and Googling will show that people expect this to work.
However, that is not set on my FC3 system, a
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--020909040800030906040005
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I've attached two files with the sources for a function to implement the
finite difference method for solving a particul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --020909040800030906040005
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi,
>
> I've attached two files with the sources for a function to implement the
> fi
Hi Nicolai,
2006/4/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --020909040800030906040005
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi,
>
> I've attached two files with the sources fo
>
> From: Philippe Grosjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> However, I was suprised to learn that the Pipeline Pilot R Collection is
> not GPL and is not free (in term of money, i.e., you have to pay
> 3500$/year to use it). I am not sure, but I think they break the GPL
> license here since they use a comm
On 4/19/2006 2:11 PM, Peter Ruckdeschel wrote:
> On 4/19/2006 1:49 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 4/18/2006 7:02 PM, Peter Ruckdeschel wrote:
>>> would it be possible to enhance either promptPackage()
>>> or the default indexing mechanism for packages
>>> so that -- if it exists -- (the content
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 08:09 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> R uses the environment variable R_PAPERSIZE to set its papersize, e.g. for
> postscript.
>
> It seems the modern way is to via LC_PAPER, e.g.
>
> http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2002-05/msg00010.html
>
> and Googling will show th
On 4/19/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, James Bullard wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am having an issue with R CMD check with the nightly build of
> > RC 2.3.0 (listed in the subject.)
>
> This is all explained in TFM, `Writing R Extensions'.
>
> > The problem is this
Marc,
Thanks for the comments. The 2.3.x series is in feature freeze, and
although a few features do break though for patch releases, they had
better be `badly needed' see
http://developer.r-project.org/devel-guidelines.txt).
So I was thinking of 2.4.0.
My suggestion was going to be along th
The documentation for gsummary describes the argument FUN as
FUN: an optional summary function or a list of summary functions
to be applied to each variable in the frame. The function or
functions are applied only to variables in 'object' that vary
within the gr
I disagree, things like README files and other objects are important and
should be included. I don't see the real advantage to such warnings, if
someone wants them they could be turned on optionally.
If size is an issue then authors should be warned that their package is
large (in the top 1% at
Prof. Ripley,
Happy to help.
So, it sounds like we are thinking along the same lines then.
A couple of follow up questions:
1. Is R_PAPERSIZE_DEFAULT to be the proposed new compile time setting in
2.4.0? Unless I missed it, I did not see it documented anywhere (ie.
R-admin/NEWS for 2.2.1 patche
Papersize can be set at compile time in the 'config.site' file (R_PAPERSIZE).
-roger
Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> Prof. Ripley,
>
> Happy to help.
>
> So, it sounds like we are thinking along the same lines then.
>
> A couple of follow up questions:
>
> 1. Is R_PAPERSIZE_DEFAULT to be the
Hi all,
I had mentioned this as a PS in a recent prior post on r-help on the use
of assign(), but presumably it got buried in the noise.
There is a typo in the R-patched and R-devel versions of assign.Rd in
the first example comments.
It is presently:
#-- Create objects 'r1', 'r2', ... 'r6' --
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Robert Gentleman wrote:
> I disagree, things like README files and other objects are important and
> should be included. I don't see the real advantage to such warnings, if
> someone wants them they could be turned on optionally.
Isn't the point at least partly that all tho
Roger,
Thanks.
Yes, this I know. In fact I have a line in my shell script for building
R[-patched]:
./configure R_PAPERSIZE=letter
R_PAPERSIZE is document in several places, however R_PAPERSIZE_DEFAULT
is not, unless I am going blind in my middle age... :-)
Regards,
Marc
On Thu, 2006-04-
On 4/20/2006 2:47 PM, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had mentioned this as a PS in a recent prior post on r-help on the use
> of assign(), but presumably it got buried in the noise.
Noise? I didn't hear anything...
I'll fix this.
Duncan Murdoch
>
> There is a typo in the R-pat
Hi,
Well, I guess if someone thinks they know how I am going to configure
and build the sources needed to construct appropriate dynamic libraries
so well that they can feel free to exclude files at their whim at
install time, perhaps they could feel just as free to exclude them at
build time
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:08 -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 4/20/2006 2:47 PM, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I had mentioned this as a PS in a recent prior post on r-help on the use
> > of assign(), but presumably it got buried in the noise.
>
> Noise? I didn't hear anythin
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Robert Gentleman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, I guess if someone thinks they know how I am going to configure and
> build the sources needed to construct appropriate dynamic libraries so well
> that they can feel free to exclude files at their whim at install time,
> perhaps they
One thing which I personally disagree with is that the procedure for
the check is different when run on a directory than on a tarball (I
am talking about the defaults here, I now know I can change it
locally). I could understand the difference if the check resulted in
an _error_ such that I
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> Roger,
>
> Thanks.
>
> Yes, this I know. In fact I have a line in my shell script for building
> R[-patched]:
>
> ./configure R_PAPERSIZE=letter
>
>
> R_PAPERSIZE is document in several places, however R_PAPERSIZE_DEFAULT
> is not, unless I am
On Apr 20, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Henrik Bengtsson (max 7Mb) wrote:
> Is it a general consensus on R-devel that *.tar.gz distributions
> should only be treated as a distribution for *building* packages
> and not for developing them?
I don't know whether this is a general consensus, but it definit
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:56 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
>
> > Roger,
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Yes, this I know. In fact I have a line in my shell script for building
> > R[-patched]:
> >
> > ./configure R_PAPERSIZE=letter
> >
> >
> > R_PAPER
24 matches
Mail list logo
