On 7/15/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/15/2006 1:37 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > On 7/15/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 7/15/2006 1:01 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >>> On 7/14/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/14/2006 3:38
On 7/15/2006 1:37 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/15/2006 1:01 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> On 7/14/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/14/2006 3:38 PM, Sebastian Luque wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the big
On 7/15/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/15/2006 1:01 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > On 7/14/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 7/14/2006 3:38 PM, Sebastian Luque wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> One of the big decisions when writing code is how to handle dates
On 7/15/2006 1:01 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/14/2006 3:38 PM, Sebastian Luque wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> One of the big decisions when writing code is how to handle dates and
>>> times. Gabor Grothendieck provided an excellent overview
On 7/14/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/14/2006 3:38 PM, Sebastian Luque wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of the big decisions when writing code is how to handle dates and
> > times. Gabor Grothendieck provided an excellent overview of the issue in
> > his R News 4/1 (2004) article,
On 7/14/2006 3:38 PM, Sebastian Luque wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the big decisions when writing code is how to handle dates and
> times. Gabor Grothendieck provided an excellent overview of the issue in
> his R News 4/1 (2004) article, and many users and developers are probably
> using it as a guide
[Sorry for my previous empty post]
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 July 2006 at 14:38, Sebastian Luque wrote:
> | If Gabor's recommendations are to be followed, wouldn't it make sense
> | to include chron in base R? Given that flexibility for handling time
> Future historia
On 14 July 2006 at 16:32, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
| On 7/14/06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Date and POSIXt have served me well over the last few years. They are
| > maintained and being extended [ 1 ]. Chron, to the best of my knowledge, is
| > dead code so I'd bet against
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 July 2006 at 14:38, Sebastian Luque wrote:
| If Gabor's recommendations are to be followed, wouldn't it make sense to
| include chron in base R? Given that flexibility for handling time
Future historians will provide a fuller account of the ext
On 7/14/06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14 July 2006 at 14:38, Sebastian Luque wrote:
> | If Gabor's recommendations are to be followed, wouldn't it make sense to
> | include chron in base R? Given that flexibility for handling time
>
> Future historians will provide a full
On 14 July 2006 at 14:38, Sebastian Luque wrote:
| If Gabor's recommendations are to be followed, wouldn't it make sense to
| include chron in base R? Given that flexibility for handling time
Future historians will provide a fuller account of the extended debates, but
my reading of these discuss
11 matches
Mail list logo
