Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 July 2006 at 14:38, Sebastian Luque wrote:
| If Gabor's recommendations are to be followed, wouldn't it make sense to
| include chron in base R? Given that flexibility for handling time
Future historians will provide a fuller account of the extended debates, but
my reading of these discussions here over the last few years leaves me with
the impression that Gabor is arguing for chron in a manner that is
simultaneously informed, polite, persistent and yet ... utterly isolated.
Date and POSIXt have served me well over the last few years. They are
maintained and being extended [ 1 ]. Chron, to the best of my knowledge, is
dead code so I'd bet against it appearing in core R any time soon.
Regards, Dirk
[ 1 ] I had some pleasant exchanges with Brian Ripley where I was able to
suggest a few extension relative to the new millisecond granularity in POSIXt
and its interfaces.
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
Seb
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
