On 13-12-13 8:36 AM, Justin Talbot wrote:
It would have those benefits, but it would be harder to prototype
changes by actually replacing the `if` function. Implementations that
want to optimize the calls have other ways to do it, e.g. the sorts of
things the compiler does.
Does anyone actua
>> It would have those benefits, but it would be harder to prototype
>> changes by actually replacing the `if` function. Implementations that
>> want to optimize the calls have other ways to do it, e.g. the sorts of
>> things the compiler does.
>>
>
> Does anyone actually prototype changes to the
>
> It would have those benefits, but it would be harder to prototype
> changes by actually replacing the `if` function. Implementations that
> want to optimize the calls have other ways to do it, e.g. the sorts of
> things the compiler does.
>
Does anyone actually prototype changes to the `if` f
On 13-12-12 3:22 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/12/2013 2:08 PM, Karl Millar wrote:
According to
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Reserved-words
if else repeat while function for in next break
TRUE FALSE NULL Inf NaN
NA NA_integer_ NA_real_ NA_complex_ N
On 12/12/2013 2:08 PM, Karl Millar wrote:
According to
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Reserved-words
if else repeat while function for in next break
TRUE FALSE NULL Inf NaN
NA NA_integer_ NA_real_ NA_complex_ NA_character_
... ..1 ..2 etc.
are all reser
