> > It would have those benefits, but it would be harder to prototype > changes by actually replacing the `if` function. Implementations that > want to optimize the calls have other ways to do it, e.g. the sorts of > things the compiler does. >
Does anyone actually prototype changes to the `if` function? Allowing users to replace the definitions of reserved keywords and builtins is horribly expensive performance-wise with or without compilation. If you look at the compiler package, the way it optimizes these function calls is by breaking the language spec. See the beginnings of sections 5 and 6 of Luke's write up (http://homepage.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/R/compiler/compiler.pdf), noting that the *default* optimization level is 2, at which level, "In addition to the inlining permitted by Level 1, functions that are syntactically special or are considered core language functions and are found via the global environment at compile time may be inlined." This is an area where a small change to the language spec would impact essentially no users and would result in a language that could be executed much more efficiently. Justin Talbot ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
