Re: [Rd] R-Forge http link redirection setup busted

Hi Gennadiy, On 20 July 2021 at 10:25, Gennadiy Starostin wrote: | Thank you for your feedback. There was a misconfigured redirection | indeed. It should work well now. Fabulous, thanks as always. | The top page does say "If you experience any problems or need help you | can submit a suppor

Re: [Rd] R-Forge http link redirection setup busted

Dear Dirk, Thank you for your feedback. There was a misconfigured redirection indeed. It should work well now. The top page does say "If you experience any problems or need help you can submit a support request to the R-Forge team or write an email to r-fo...@r-project.org. Thanks... and en

Re: [Rd] R-Forge http link redirection setup busted

Hi, Only you can unsubscribe yourself. Please visit: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/options/r-devel where you can unsubscribe from this list and if needed, get a password reminder, after entering your email address. Regards, Marc Schwartz > On Jul 19, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Arlene Battishill >

Re: [Rd] R-Forge http link redirection setup busted

On 7/19/21 3:36 PM, Marc Schwartz via R-devel wrote: Dirk, I have not use R-Forge in years, but on the main page (https://r-forge.r-project.org), just before the blue "Latest News" box, it shows: "If you experience any problems or need help you can submit a support request to the R-Forge

Re: [Rd] R-Forge http link redirection setup busted

Dirk, I have not use R-Forge in years, but on the main page (https://r-forge.r-project.org), just before the blue "Latest News" box, it shows: "If you experience any problems or need help you can submit a support request to the R-Forge team or write an email to r-fo...@r-project.org." I ha

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On 14 July 2019 at 13:08, Spencer Graves wrote: | for that.  I lost the history in doing so, but I can live without that | history. Well many of us imported svn repos into git repos. And my favourite example is still ESS as it has history back to 1997 (!!) thanks to cvs2svn pre-filling its svn

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

  Thanks to Ott and others, I now have separate GitHub repositories, one for each of the packages combined in the Ecdat R-Forge project.  In case it might help others in the future, I will summarize here key things I did to make this transition:         1.  I first copied the "Ecfun"

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

  Thanks so much for your help.   Now your "git push -u origin master" was "![rejected]", after creating a new SSH and after your "git clone" and other "git remote rename ..." commands seemed to work: $ git clone g...@github.com:joshuaulrich/tmp-ecfun.git Ecdat # Cloning into 'Ecdat

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Apparently you created id_rsa key pair with a passphrase. Passphrase is like an additional password protection layer on your ssh key. I don't know how did you create it. But you can always create a new one (you should delete the old one before you create a new one) using the shell command 'ssh-k

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On 2019-06-30 06:58, Joshua Ulrich wrote: I imported both packages into separate repositories: https://github.com/joshuaulrich/tmp-ecdat https://github.com/joshuaulrich/tmp-ecfun I changed your email address on your R-Forge commits to match your GitHub email address, so R-Forge commits woul

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Joshua Ulrich wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:06 PM Spencer Graves > wrote: > > > > Hi, Henrik et al.: > > > > > >What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub > > projects from one containing two packages? > > > > > >Currently,

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:06 PM Spencer Graves wrote: > > Hi, Henrik et al.: > > >What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub > projects from one containing two packages? > > >Currently, "github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat" consists primarily of a > directory "pkg" with

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Hi, Henrik et al.:   What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub projects from one containing two packages?   Currently, "github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat" consists primarily of a directory "pkg" with subdirectories "Ecdat" and "Ecfun" containing the two packages.  I n

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 9:43 AM Spencer Graves wrote: > > Hi, Ott et al.: > > >What's the best way to get "Travis CI" to build and test the two > packages, Ecdat and Ecfun, that have long been combined in the Ecdat > project? > > >Following Ott's advice and studying studying Wickha

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Hi, Ott et al.:   What's the best way to get "Travis CI" to build and test the two packages, Ecdat and Ecfun, that have long been combined in the Ecdat project?   Following Ott's advice and studying studying Wickham's "R Packages" (http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/), I was able to configure

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Apparently your username/password are wrong. Can you clone/push from other repos? You do not need authorization when cloning a public repo, so even incorrect credentials may work (haven't tested this though). But for push you have to have that in order. I suggest you create ssh keys, upload tho

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Thanks to Duncan, Henrik and Henrik, Brian, and Gábor:   I created a local copy of the new GitHub version using the following: git clone https://sbgraves237:mypassw...@github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat.git   That worked in the sense that I got a local copy.  However, after I rolled the

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Whereas it is true that one has to contact GitHub to detach a GitHub repository, it really is no problem (or at least was no problem in 2016). I wanted to do so when I took over the maintainer role of LaplacesDemon which only remained on GitHub as a fork on some other person's private account. So I

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Re your point 3: Because you have managed to create a GitHub version of your repository that is not a fork of https://github.com/rforge/ecdat, but its own independent repository, contacting GitHub support might not be the right way forward. Note that https://github.com/rforge is simply a read-only

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On 28/06/2019 6:26 a.m., Gábor Csárdi wrote: Instead, you can do as Duncan suggested, and put a README in your R-Forge repository, that points to *your* GitHub repositor(y/ies). Then the https://github.com/rforge/ecdat read only mirror will pick this up and will point there as well. Just for t

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Spencer, on your point 3. below, we took a different path in migrating several packages. After we migrated to github as the new master copy, we made new commits to the now orphaned R-Forge copies to include a new .onAttach function as so: .onAttach <- function(libname, pkgname) { repo <- "h

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 6:01 AM Spencer Graves wrote: [...] > 1. Clone a copy of "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat"; > to my local computer and confirm that it works. > I suggest you put each package in its own repository, because our R tooling (e.g. Travis CI, etc.) works best

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Henrik's advice is all good. I would say his idea of the final commit of a README pointer is better than deleting things at R-forge; there is likely old information out there somewhere pointing to R-forge as a location for Ecdat development, and any bug reports or discussion on R-forge will no

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

Hi, Henrik Singmann et al.:   Thanks for the suggestions.  I tried again to pull "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat"; from R-Forge, with the same "Error 500" as before.  Then I tried pulling from "https://github.com/rforge/ecdat";, which seemed to work ... AND the copy I pulled was at

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

� Thanks.� I'm still having problems: ��� ��� 1.� I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard GitHub account ��� ��� 2.� Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a repository", as Lionel suggested. ��� ��� 3.�

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

  Thanks to Duncan, Lionel and Henrik for their quick replies. I have further questions:        1.  Will GitHub automatically transfer the commits I made to R-Forge in the past couple of days?  R-Forge is now at Rev. 420, and GitHub is still at 418.  Will 419 and 420 be automatically

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On 26/06/2019 1:38 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote:   Thanks.  I'm still having problems:         1.  I went to "github.com" and logged in with my standard GitHub account         2.  Then I clicked "+" in the upper right, just left of my GitHub ID icon, and selected "Import a rep

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

One thing that needs manual work is making each SVN username mP to a Git (username, email address). This often involved asking contributors what their preferred endless Git address is. The email address is what for instance GitHub uses to associate a commit authorship with a user account. You can

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

I think all 3 issues are solved by: 1. Use the "+" button on github.com and select "Import a repository". 2. Pass the URL of your SVN repo. Lionel > On 26 Jun 2019, at 18:58, Spencer Graves wrote: > > Thanks to Duncan, Lionel and Henrik for their quick replies. I ha

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

> On 26 Jun 2019, at 17:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > R-Forge is mirrored on Github; see https://github.com/rforge/ecdat, for > example. That shows 418 commits in its history; presumably that's the full > R-forge history. I think that's newer than Michael Friendly's gist. > > So I suspect

Re: [Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?

On 26/06/2019 10:34 a.m., Spencer Graves wrote: Hello, All:   What's the status and future plans for R-Forge?   I ask primarily because a problem I reported May 15 and 17 via two different channels has yet to be fixed, and it prevents my development versions of the Ecdat and Ecfun

Re: [Rd] [R-Forge] R-forge down ?

Thanks. I appreciate all you do to keep it working. Spencer Graves On 7/1/2016 11:19 AM, Martin Pacala wrote: Yeah, it was meant to be a very short downtime, but then the server had a problem with booting which prolonged the process. It's back up again On 07/01/2016 06:03 PM, Martin Maechl

Re: [Rd] [R-Forge] R-forge down ?

Yeah, it was meant to be a very short downtime, but then the server had a problem with booting which prolonged the process. It's back up again On 07/01/2016 06:03 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: It looks to me that R-forge has been down for at least two hours now... _

Re: [Rd] R-forge down ?

I've experienced multiple outages that last for days on R-Forge in recent years. Eventually, I write to r-fo...@r-project.org, and they get it restarted. R-Forge is a great service, and I don't wish to complain, especially since I'm not paying for it. Several times I've offered

Re: [Rd] r-forge

On 08.02.2013 16:41, Edzer Pebesma wrote: On 02/08/2013 03:22 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote: Perhaps the R-forge results are outdated? Looks like the R-forge builds (and hence probably also the checks) are stuck since some days. Nice understatement. Several of my packages don't build on r-forge f

Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

Am 15.01.2013 21:37, schrieb Paul Gilbert: > I'm surprised this works on Windows and Mac, since RMonetDB does not > seem to be on CRAN. I thought it was still a requirement that > dependencies need to be on CRAN (which makes development difficult for > related packages like this). Sorry for my so

Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

9.36 > > > -- Do Not Disapprove > > > > > > -Original Message----- From: > > r-devel-boun...@r-project.org > > [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Uwe > > Ligges Sent: dinsdag 15 januari 2013 21:09 To: Thomas &

Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

m: > r-devel-boun...@r-project.org > [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Uwe > Ligges Sent: dinsdag 15 januari 2013 21:09 To: Thomas > Lumley Cc: Stefan Theussl; R-devel Subject: Re: [Rd] > R-forge, package dependencies > On 15.01.2013 2

Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

I'm surprised this works on Windows and Mac, since RMonetDB does not seem to be on CRAN. I thought it was still a requirement that dependencies need to be on CRAN (which makes development difficult for related packages like this). A related long standing request is that R-forge checking look f

Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

To: Thomas Lumley Cc: Stefan Theussl; R-devel Subject: Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies On 15.01.2013 20:47, Thomas Lumley wrote: > I have a project on R-forge (sqlsurvey.r-forge.r-project.org) with two > packages, RMonetDB and sqlsurvey. > > At the moment, sqlsurvey is list

Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

On 15.01.2013 20:47, Thomas Lumley wrote: I have a project on R-forge (sqlsurvey.r-forge.r-project.org) with two packages, RMonetDB and sqlsurvey. At the moment, sqlsurvey is listed as failing to build. The error is on the Linux package check, which says that RMonetDB is not available: * ch

Re: [Rd] r-forge build failure bafflement

On 12-03-30 08:14 PM, Brian G. Peterson wrote: > On my phone, so replying off-list, but wouldn't loading the data > objects in a running R session and using the appropriate > compression arguments to save() do the trick? - Brian I might try that, but I have a strong suspicion that R will try to

Re: [Rd] r-forge build failure bafflement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Figured it out (I think: I haven't gotten through restructuring and testing, but I think it's going to work now). I was paying insufficient attention to the build arguments, in particular - --resave-data=best. I previously had the clever idea to

Re: [Rd] r-forge build failure bafflement

We've seen similar things several times with CRAN submissions. Basic scenario was - INSTALL (via build or check) is trying to install a package that is not already installed, into a private library not on the usual .libPaths(). - Start-up code in that package is looking for the package, and

Re: [Rd] r-forge build failure bafflement

On 29.03.2012 22:54, Ben Bolker wrote: I am attempting to build a package on r-forge and running into a weird error. I have been in correspondence with the R-forge admins and am turning to r-devel on the remote chance that someone might have a guess as to what is going wrong or a suggestio

Re: [Rd] R-Forge down

On 03/16/2011 05:43 PM, Max Kuhn wrote: Web page and svn, but you probably already know this. Thanks a lot for the note. This is due to a network system failure at WU. From the intranet we cannot connect to services outside and vice versa. I hope the guys at IT services will fix this soon.

Re: [Rd] R-Forge is dark

On 16 February 2011 at 08:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Hoping that it is nothing to permanent, could someone with the power to do so | please give the r-forge machine (or something in the network controlling | access to it) a good shake or reboot ? That appears to have been temporary. http an

Re: [Rd] R-forge out?

On 29/12/2010 12:44 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote: Is anyone else having trouble connecting to R-forge svn? (Perhaps I missed an outage announcement, or is it bad weather?) I've also had trouble since yesterday. The main web page also appears to be down... Duncan Murdoch ___

Re: [Rd] R-Forge Downtime

Hi, Stefan: Thanks for all your hard work to make R-Forge available for the rest of us. Best Wishes, Spencer On 11/8/2010 4:59 AM, Stefan Theussl wrote: To all R-Forge developers/users: Please note the short (<30min.) R-Forge downtime today at 18:00 CET. Details: We need to extend disk sp

Re: [Rd] r-forge down?

On 10/18/2010 01:07 PM, Philippe Grosjean wrote: Thanks anyway for all your work on R-Forge... We will probably survive this thread ;-) Once you will got an hardware upgrade, I think we will all be happy to recover complete testing of developed packages (Linux 32/64bit, Mac 32/64bit, Windows 32

Re: [Rd] r-forge down?

Thanks anyway for all your work on R-Forge... We will probably survive this thread ;-) Once you will got an hardware upgrade, I think we will all be happy to recover complete testing of developed packages (Linux 32/64bit, Mac 32/64bit, Windows 32/64bit), ... if possible. Best, Philippe ..

Re: [Rd] r-forge down?

On 10/16/2010 10:27 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: anyone have a status report on r-forge ... ? From here (Hamilton, ON) I can't ping ... PING r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at (137.208.57.38) 56(84) bytes of data. The machine was restarted today morning. We are sorry for the downtime. We need to migrat

Re: [Rd] R-forge: Web server down / no space left

I tried it now and it works. It might have been something momentary. Original message >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:14:37 -0700 >From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org (on behalf of Henrik Bengtsson >) >Subject: [Rd] R-forge: Web server down / no space left >To: R-devel > >FYI and for the

Re: [Rd] R forge : svn + ssh without key

Works for me, I guess you do not have an appropriate ssh connected to your svn client. Perhaps better ask such questions on the R-forge platform? Best, Uwe Ligges On 24.08.2010 15:56, christophe.genolini wrote: Hi the list, I am trying to use R forge. I created an account. I put my project

Re: [Rd] r-forge certificate expired?

On 01.06.2010 11:18, Michał Bojanowski wrote: Is anybody else getting the error that R-Forge's certificate has expired on 2010-05-21? I'm wondering if it is safe to proceed with adding a security exception... Yes, I asked Stefan already and R-forge is trying to get a new one which takes mo

Re: [Rd] R-Forge Problems

On 5/05/10 20:53 PM, "Gabor Grothendieck" wrote: > If I go to: > > http://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/?group_id=18 > > and click on [Browse Subversion Repository] in the box to the right it > takes me to a page that says this: > > Traceback (most recent call last): File > "/usr/lib/gforge/bin//v

Re: [Rd] R-Forge SVN repositories: R CMD build/check error on Windows machines

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Stefan Theussl wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 28/04/2008 12:22 PM, Stefan Theussl wrote: Dear R-devel, One of our R-Forge developers pointed out that it is not possible to build packages under Windows using the R-Forge repository structure: a package resides in ./pkg -

Re: [Rd] R-Forge SVN repositories: R CMD build/check error on Windows machines

Deepayan Sarkar wrote: On 4/28/08, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The difference is in INSTALL, not build/check. You are right that the Unix INSTALL was changed in r25808 (Aug 2003), but AFAICS this was not documented at the time in [O]NEWS, nor anywhere else. Can you point

Re: [Rd] R-Forge SVN repositories: R CMD build/check error on Windows machines

Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 28/04/2008 12:22 PM, Stefan Theussl wrote: Dear R-devel, One of our R-Forge developers pointed out that it is not possible to build packages under Windows using the R-Forge repository structure: a package resides in ./pkg - not in a directory with the same name as th

Re: [Rd] R-Forge SVN repositories: R CMD build/check error on Windows machines

On 4/28/08, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The difference is in INSTALL, not build/check. > > You are right that the Unix INSTALL was changed in r25808 (Aug 2003), but > AFAICS this was not documented at the time in [O]NEWS, nor anywhere else. > > Can you point me to the documenta

Re: [Rd] R-Forge SVN repositories: R CMD build/check error on Windows machines

The difference is in INSTALL, not build/check. You are right that the Unix INSTALL was changed in r25808 (Aug 2003), but AFAICS this was not documented at the time in [O]NEWS, nor anywhere else. Can you point me to the documentation you used to implement this? On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Duncan Mur

Re: [Rd] R-Forge SVN repositories: R CMD build/check error on Windows machines

On 28/04/2008 12:22 PM, Stefan Theussl wrote: Dear R-devel, One of our R-Forge developers pointed out that it is not possible to build packages under Windows using the R-Forge repository structure: a package resides in ./pkg - not in a directory with the same name as the package name. Under

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

Gregor Gorjanc wrote: > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting subscriptions. > Great! However, browsing a bit on the site I found a link to another > forge: R-Forge (http://r-forge.r-project.org/). > > Is/will t

Re: [Rd] R-Forge

Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for working on this and offering us this service. One thing I > wonder is about backup. What kind of backup do you use or plan to > use? We plan to daily backup the svn repositories and the database (which contains R-Forge specific data). The files are st

Re: [Rd] R-Forge

Hi, thanks for working on this and offering us this service. One thing I wonder is about backup. What kind of backup do you use or plan to use? Best, Henrik On 4/6/07, Stefan Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Gregor, > > Yes, R-Forge.R-project.org will be the official forge for the R

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

hadley wickham wrote: >> > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon >> > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting subscriptions. >> > Great! However, browsing a bit on the site I found a link to another >> > forge: R-Forge (http://r-forge.r-project.org/). >>

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

hadley wickham wrote: > On 4/6/07, Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:22 PM, hadley wickham wrote: >> >>> On 4/6/07, Stefan Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hadley wickham wrote: >>> I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon >

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

On 4/6/07, Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:22 PM, hadley wickham wrote: > > > On 4/6/07, Stefan Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> hadley wickham wrote: > > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > > Urbanek and found out t

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

On 4/6/07, hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/6/07, Stefan Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hadley wickham wrote: > > >> > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > > >> > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting subscriptions. > > >> > G

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:22 PM, hadley wickham wrote: > On 4/6/07, Stefan Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hadley wickham wrote: > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting > subscriptions. > Gre

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

On 4/6/07, Stefan Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hadley wickham wrote: > >> > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > >> > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting subscriptions. > >> > Great! However, browsing a bit on the site I found a link to ano

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

> > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting subscriptions. > > Great! However, browsing a bit on the site I found a link to another > > forge: R-Forge (http://r-forge.r-project.org/). > > > > Is/will the last one

Re: [Rd] R-Forge?

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Gregor Gorjanc wrote: > Hello! > > I have recently found RForge.net (http://www.rforge.net/) by Simon > Urbanek and found out today that the site is accepting subscriptions. > Great! However, browsing a bit on the site I found a link to another > forge: R-Forge (http://r-forge.