Re: [Rd] Query about .check_packages_used_in_examples

2010-10-11 Thread Berwin A Turlach
G'day Brian, On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:11:42 +0100 (BST) Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Sounds reasonable to count Imports, so we'll alter this. Thanks for that. I noticed the changes to R-devel and to the R-2-12-branch. Looking at the diffs (an example is appended below), it seems to me that, except

Re: [Rd] Query about .check_packages_used_in_examples

2010-10-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Sounds reasonable to count Imports, so we'll alter this. Thank you for the report, However, the pre-test period for 2.12.0 is already 80% over and we are in code freeze -- reports early on in the period are much more useful and at this stage anything but very simple localized changes need to

Re: [Rd] Query about .check_packages_used_in_examples

2010-10-10 Thread Berwin A Turlach
G'day all, sorry, should proof-read better before hitting the send button... On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:06:46 +0800 Berwin A Turlach wrote: > But then I noticed that for another package I have on R-forge a > similar note is issued: > https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=630&log=check_x86_64_li