G'day all, sorry, should proof-read better before hitting the send button...
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:06:46 +0800 Berwin A Turlach <ber...@maths.uwa.edu.au> wrote: > But then I noticed that for another package I have on R-forge a > similar note is issued: > https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=630&log=check_x86_64_linux&pkg=DeconWK&flavor=devel > O.k., R-forge is using R-devel, so I installed R 2.12.0 RC (2010-10-10 > r53273) on my machine to check, same note is issued. > > The note issued by R CMD check says: > * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... NOTE > 'library' or 'require' call not declared from: ks > which is a bit surprising. > > There are three .Rd files that have a library(ks) in them and ks is > listed in the Imports: of the description file. > > This seems to be completely in line with the documentation in "Writing > R extensions": > > @item > Packages whose name space only is needed to load the package > using @code{library(@var{pkgname})} must be listed in the > @samp{Imports} field and not in the @samp{Depends} field. > > that's why ks is listed in depends ks is listed in the Imports: line in the DESCRIPTION file of the package in question, not in the Depends: line. > @item > All packages that are needed to successfully run @code{R CMD > check} on the package must be listed in one of @samp{Depends} > or @samp{Suggests} or @samp{Imports}. [...] > > which seems to be adhered to, since ks is in the depends. Again, this depends should read Imports. Sorry if this created confusion. Cheers, Berwin ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
