Re: [Rd] Problems with autoconf example from r-ext.

2005-10-05 Thread dhinds
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current R-exts.texi has > AC_INIT([RODBC], 1.1.4) dnl package name, version > and that is crucially different from your example. Autoconf 2.59 has a > barely documented back-compatibility mode than is invoked for AC_INIT with > just one argume

Re: [Rd] Problems with autoconf example from r-ext.

2005-10-05 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
The current R-exts.texi has AC_INIT([RODBC], 1.1.4) dnl package name, version and that is crucially different from your example. Autoconf 2.59 has a barely documented back-compatibility mode than is invoked for AC_INIT with just one argument. since in has a pare On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, nwew wro

[Rd] Problems with autoconf example from r-ext.

2005-10-05 Thread nwew
Dear R-developers, I am trying to reproduce the autoconf.ac example from R-ext and fail. My autoconf file looks like this [autoconf.ac] # original by Friedrich Leisch, much changed by BDR AC_INIT([SBMLodeSolveR]) dnl Select an optional include path, from a configure option dnl or from an envir