nything else I could look at?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Iago
>
>
>
> Iago Mosqueira wrote:
>
>
>>>-Mensaje original-
>>>De: Paul Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Enviado el: jue 22/06/2006 15:47
>>>Para: Iago Mosqueira
>>
t outside of the bundle is solved with
Depends: in DESCRIPTION.
Is there anything else I could look at?
Thanks,
Iago
Iago Mosqueira wrote:
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: Paul Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Enviado el: jue 22/06/2006 15:47
> > Para: Iago M
PROTECTED]
> > Enviado el: jue 22/06/2006 15:47
> > Para: Iago Mosqueira
> > CC: r-devel@r-project.org
> > Asunto: Re: [Rd] NAMESPACE and bundle
>
> > Iago
>
> > There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differently than
> > individual
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Paul Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jue 22/06/2006 15:47
> Para: Iago Mosqueira
> CC: r-devel@r-project.org
> Asunto: Re: [Rd] NAMESPACE and bundle
> Iago
> There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differ
Iago
There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differently than
individual package checking in this regard. I think it has to do with
when the namespace gets registered, or something like that. As I recall,
the work around is to explicitely require the package in the test files
Dear all,
I have a package that passes R CMD check, and shows no problems when using all
its methods as declared in NAMESPACE. When this package is added to a bundle,
which already consists of 5 packages, the examples in the Rd pages thta call a
number of methods fail during the bundle check. T
