Iago
There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differently than
individual package checking in this regard. I think it has to do with
when the namespace gets registered, or something like that. As I recall,
the work around is to explicitely require the package in the test files
for it. I.e. put
require("pac")
in all the files in pac/tests. If that does not work, let me know and
I will look more carefully to find what I had to do.
Paul
Iago Mosqueira wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I have a package that passes R CMD check, and shows no problems when using all
>its methods as declared in NAMESPACE. When this package is added to a bundle,
>which already consists of 5 packages, the examples in the Rd pages thta call a
>number of methods fail during the bundle check. These all passed when check is
>run on this package alone. Other packages in the bundle are very similar, in
>that all import all S4 classes and methods from the first package (using
>import("FLCore") in NAMESPACE) in the bundle, and export their own overloaded
>methods.
>
>If I run check on a mini-bundle consisting only of the main package (FLCore)
>and this problematic package, it shows no problem. So I assume a problem of
>NAMESPACE conflict is the culprit, but experimnting with various package
>combinations, to try and isolate the conflict, has not worked. This package
>seems to conflict with every other secondary package.
>
>I am dealing with internal dependencies by adding a require(FLCore) line to
>the .onLoad() call in zzz.R
>
>Can anybody point me at what to look for? What could be the reason for this
>problem?
>
>I hope the explanation was clear enough. Many thanks,
>
>
>Iago
>
>
>Dr. Iago Mosqueira
>
>Marine Research Division
>AZTI Tecnalia
>Txatxarramendi Ugartea, z/g
>48395 Sukarrieta - Bizkaia
>Spain
>
>+34 946 029 448
>+34 946 029 400
>+34 946 029 401 (Fax)
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.azti.es/
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>______________________________________________
>[email protected] mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>
====================================================================================
La version française suit le texte anglais.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential inform...{{dropped}}
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
