Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-20 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: [...] > > Two places to look for such information on CRAN: > > - Where a fair amount of information needs to be given (like exactly which > versions have been removed), there may be a README in the Archive > directory. E.g. http://cran.r-

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-20 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 19/03/2015 19:26, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 19/03/2015 2:55 PM, peter dalgaard wrote: > On 19 Mar 2015, at 19:45 , Gábor Csárdi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Dan Tenenbaum > wrote: > [...] > >> >> In github? ;-) >> > > Well, that's the thing. If github/cran is a read-only mirro

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 19/03/2015 2:55 PM, peter dalgaard wrote: > On 19 Mar 2015, at 19:45 , Gábor Csárdi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Dan Tenenbaum > wrote: > [...] > >> >> In github? ;-) >> > > Well, that's the thing. If github/cran is a read-only mirror, then should I > delete these versions fro

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread peter dalgaard
> On 19 Mar 2015, at 19:45 , Gábor Csárdi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Dan Tenenbaum > wrote: > [...] > >> >> In github? ;-) >> > > Well, that's the thing. If github/cran is a read-only mirror, then should I > delete these versions from there, too? :) On CRAN not just the fil

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: [...] > > In github? ;-) > Well, that's the thing. If github/cran is a read-only mirror, then should I delete these versions from there, too? :) On CRAN not just the files are missing, but these versions are also missing from the RDS database

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Gábor Csárdi" > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" > Cc: r-devel@r-project.org, "John McKown" > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 11:15:47 AM > Subject: Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source > > > > &

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: [...] > > Because the latest version failed to build on Mavericks: > > > http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-osx-x86_64-mavericks/Rglpk-00install.html > > Possibly because a system requirement is not installed. > Thanks, indeed.

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - > From: "Gábor Csárdi" > To: "John McKown" > Cc: r-devel@r-project.org > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:03:37 AM > Subject: Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John McKown >

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John McKown wrote: [...] > > OOPS, I saw the 0.6 package source, not 0.5. My mistake. Why not > recompile? Do you require 0.5 for some reason? I would guess that CRAN > requires only the _current_ source, not _every_ source. Well, it seems to me that for the OSX

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:54 AM, John McKown wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi > wrote: > [...] > > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rglpk/index.html > > I went there and say a source package: > > > > Downloads: > > Reference manual:Rglpk.pdf > Package source:Rglpk

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:54 AM, John McKown wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> this is a CRAN question, so I am sorry if this is not the appropriate forum. >> >> I noticed that there is at least one CRAN package that has a binary (OSX >> Mavericks) f

Re: [Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > Hi All, > > this is a CRAN question, so I am sorry if this is not the appropriate forum. > > I noticed that there is at least one CRAN package that has a binary (OSX > Mavericks) for a version, that does not have any source package on CRAN. O

[Rd] CRAN binary, but no source

2015-03-19 Thread Gábor Csárdi
Hi All, this is a CRAN question, so I am sorry if this is not the appropriate forum. I noticed that there is at least one CRAN package that has a binary (OSX Mavericks) for a version, that does not have any source package on CRAN. Or at least I am unable to locate it. The package is Rglpk: http:/