Re: [Rd] Problem installing Biobase on Solaris

2008-09-06 Thread Paulo Nuin
Sparc system (I do on amd64), but we have in the past and will again when we have a box back in production use. We did find the Sun Studio compiler (which is a free download) worked much more smoothly than gcc and gave better performance. On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Paulo Nuin wrote: Hi I thought o

Re: [Rd] Problem installing Biobase on Solaris

2008-09-05 Thread Paulo Nuin
s that you are mixing gcc (which has __builtin_isnan) and cc (which does not). On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Paulo Nuin wrote: Hi everyone This is my first post to the list. I had experience installing and using Bioconductor on Linux and Windows systems but I am encountering problems installing

Re: [Rd] Problem installing Biobase on Solaris

2008-09-05 Thread Paulo Nuin
compiler R is using? Thanks in advance Paulo Prof Brian Ripley wrote: What compiler is this? This is a compiler issue, not an R one. My guess is that you are mixing gcc (which has __builtin_isnan) and cc (which does not). On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Paulo Nuin wrote: Hi everyone This is my first post

[Rd] Problem installing Biobase on Solaris

2008-09-05 Thread Paulo Nuin
Hi everyone This is my first post to the list. I had experience installing and using Bioconductor on Linux and Windows systems but I am encountering problems installing Biobase on Solaris running on Sparc. The package compilation works fine, with only a warning warning: implicit declaration