e goat were married and lived together until the end of
their days. Either the goat went mad or the bear became sane."
Nicholas Lewin-Koh
Genentech
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Hi Charlotte,
I think I would have to respectfully disagree with you on many points.
While we all sigh when we see heatmaps used as data to explain
everything,
they do have their uses. But beyond heat maps, the nature and demands of
modern
statistical graphics has changed. Plotting huge data sets r
,
I have a member of an object that can be an integer, a function
returning an integer
or NA, perhaps it would be better to specify it as an integer, a
function or NULL.
Nicholas
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:41 -0400, "Duncan Murdoch"
wrote:
> On 9/30/2009 2:29 PM, Nicholas Lewin-Koh
Hi
the following example I think demonstrates the inconsistency
> f<-function(x) x
> length(f)
[1] 1
> is.na(f)
[1] FALSE
Warning message:
In is.na(f) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector) of type 'closure'
The documentation states:
Arguments
x an R object to be tested.
value a suitabl
With header this time
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:08 -0700, "Nicholas Lewin-Koh"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I would also be in favor of a stronger stance on licenses. In
> industry, where we can really get in big trouble for violating a
> license,
> we often maintain internal repositori
Hi,
I would also be in favor of a stronger stance on licenses. In
industry, where we can really get in big trouble for violating a
license,
we often maintain internal repositories, or need to be careful about
filtering
what is used from CRAN. I think that is should really be a requirement
the packa
ors from a zipf
distribution,
and I did have a predict method (which is a fair assumption) would that
fail because the rzipf function would not be accessed?
Nicholas
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:10:26 +0100, "Martin Maechler"
said:
> >>>>> "NicLK" == Nicholas Lew
Hi,
For extended glms such as gams, gnm or other distributions
such as negative binomial, would there need to be a separate simulate
method?
Or, could the current framework, rather than stopping with an error
look for the appropriate model matrix, coefficients, distribution
function and family obje
Hi Frank,
Thank you for the correction, I don't work in clinical, so good you keep
me honest.
Nicholas
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:21:23 -0600, "Frank E Harrell Jr"
said:
> Nicholas please note that FDA does not require type III sums of squares,
> LOCF, and the use of any particular software. It is j
t; lists, where a common refrain in response to bug reports is that "you
> aren't using the latest and greatest version", without an appreciation
> of the fact that there can be good reasons for not changing something
> that you know works).
>
> Best,
> K
Hi,
Kudos, nice exposure, but to make this more appropriate to R-devel I
would just
like to make a small comment about the point made by the SAS executive
about getting
on an airplane yada yada ...
1) It would seem to me that R has certification documents
2) anyone designing airplanes, analyzing c
Wow, this has to win the prize for some of the most obscure
documentation ever.
Kudos on your M$-archaeology.
Nicholas
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:23:51 -0500
From: "Gabor Grothendieck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Rd] Unix-like touch to update modification timestamp of
file?
Hi,
The move to sRGB is nice, is there any interest in adding an interface
to lcms, http://www.littlecms.com,
to allow gamut matching? I can think of a lot of instances where I would
like to render a
figure as it would appear on my printer. This is probably best done as a
separate package though,
a
sentence to "optim method 'L-BFGS-B' will not work
since there is way to specify the upper and lower constraints"
Thanks
Nicholas
Nicholas
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:46:01 +0100 (BST), "Prof Brian Ripley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Nicholas
Hi,
I was just able to try this on a windows xp machine
using R-2.5.1. gnls exits gracefully with an error
so maybe this is a problem with my R installation. If
so sorry to bother everyone. Does anyone have an idea
which installation parameters to tweek that might cure
this?
Thanks
Nicholas
___
Hi,
Following up on my own post, if in gnlsControl I specify
opt='optim' gnls exits quite nicely, with an error, which
is what I would expect. Is this a bug in nlminb?
Nicholas
tt<-gnls(response~SSllogis(conc,A,B,xmid,scal),tdat,start=start,weights=varPower(),verbose=TRUE,control=gnlsControl(opt
Hi,
I am not sure this is a bug but I can repeat it, The functions and data
are below.
I know this is nasty data, and it is very questionable whether a 4pl
model
is appropriate, but it is data fed to an automated tool and I would
have hoped for an error. Does this repeat for anyone else?
My details
Hi,
In my earlier post I eluded to a situation where that would be useful.
In nlme, there is a choice of optimizers, minpack.lm has
Levenberg-Marquardt,
while nlminb has the port routines. For the same starting values,
different
optimizers will present different solutions, having a common interfac
Hi Andrew,
I have been working quite a bit with optim and friends on automated
nonlinear fitting, mainly for calibration. All of the optimizers
seem to have trouble in the tricky situation of fitting a log-logistic
model when the upper asymptote is not well defined, and trying to
estimate a vari
Hi Walton,
Sorry I don't follow R-help very much, but here is a nice solution to
what you are looking for in the A2R package. I don't think it is on cran
yet.
http://addictedtor.free.fr/graphiques/graphcode.php?graph=79
Nicholas
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:12:52 -0400 (EDT)
> Fr
Those results plus "str(fm1)" looked like they might help answer your
> question. However, I don't understand enough of what you are asking to
> say.
>
> If an answer might still be worth pursuing to you, I suggest you read
> the posting guide and submit
Hi,
I guess this is a final plea, and maybe this should go to R-help but
here goes.
I am writing a set of functions for calibration and prediction, and to
calculate standard
errors and intervals I need the variance function to be evaluated at new
prediction points.
So for instance
fit<-gnls(Y~SSl
at x0 using predict(fit, newdata=list(covar=x0)) to
get the fitted value
but how to I plug that in to the varStruct stored in fit$modelStruct?
Thanks
Nicholas
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:48:18 -0500, "Douglas Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On 7/19/05, Nicholas Lewin-Koh <[EMAIL P
Hello,
I am writing a set of functions to do prediction and calibration
intervals
for at least the subset of selfstarting models if not some more general
ones.
I need to be able to extract the varFunction from a fit object
and evaluate it at a predicted point. Are there any examples around?
Also
24 matches
Mail list logo