On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 11-03-30 01:55 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
What R CMD build (and check) does is to call tools::buildVignettes.
That has been true for a while, and buildVignettes() returns if no
vignettes are found. The docs are out-of-date.
My view is that you are m
The intention was more to have another place to make the user aware of a
real-sized data package I made, since the package only comes with trivially
sized data. The help examples and vignette only use the small sized data, and
never the realistic dataset. I suppose it is better just to put a ref
On 27 April 2011 11:06, baptiste auguie wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm puzzled by the behavior of stringHeight in the grid package.
> Consider the following test,
>
> library(grid)
>
> test <- function(lab="dog", ...){
> g1 <- textGrob(lab)
> g2 <- rectGrob(height=grobHeight(g1), width=grobWidth(g1)
On 11-03-30 01:55 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
What R CMD build (and check) does is to call tools::buildVignettes.
That has been true for a while, and buildVignettes() returns if no
vignettes are found. The docs are out-of-date.
My view is that you are misusing inst/doc: it is intended *only* fo
Several Bioconductor packages were expecting Windows Rzlib.dll to
provide gzopen / gzread / gzseek / gzgets / gzrewind / gzclose. Are
these gone for good, viz., r55624 ?
Martin
--
Computational Biology
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
If Martin's proposal is accepted, does
that mean that the median method for
data frames would be something like:
function (x, ...)
{
stop(paste("you probably mean to use the command: sapply(",
deparse(substitute(x)), ", median)", sep=""))
}
Pat
On 29/04/2011 15:25, Mart
> Maybe also useful to distinguish between package check and INSTALL, where
> during the former the Suggests: package must be present (modulo setting
> additional flags) but in the latter may not be. The Bioconductor build
> system, for instance, would install RepitoolsExamples before running R CM
> My personal oppinion is that mean.data.frame() should never have
> been written.
> People should know, or learn, to use apply functions for such a
> task.
>
> The unfortunate fact that mean.data.frame() exists makes people
> think that median.data.frame() should too,
> and then
>
> var.data.fra
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Martin Maechler
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:25 AM
> To: Paul Johnson
> Cc: r-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] median and data frames
> [ ... lots of lines elided ... ]
> My vote is for deprecating mean.data
On 04/29/2011 07:36 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Apr 29, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Hello,
In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that
I've
On Apr 29, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that
>>> I've deleted from my libra
> Paul Johnson
> on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:20:27 -0500 writes:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Burns
> wrote:
>> Here are some data frames:
>>
>> df3.2 <- data.frame(1:3, 7:9)
>> df4.2 <- data.frame(1:4, 7:10)
>> df3.3 <- data.frame(1:3, 7:9, 10:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests: that
>> I've deleted from my library to test what the user who doesn't have it will
>> experience.
>>
>>
> Ben Bolker
> on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:06:01 -0400 writes:
> would it be possible / make sense to copy some of the
> information in ?news into the R-exts manual, where package
> writers are most likely (?) to look for it?
sure...
> The information therein seems m
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Hello,
In my description file, I have an example data package in Suggests:
that I've deleted from my library to test what the user who doesn't
have it will experience.
However, R CMD check won't even pass my package :
* checking package dependenci
15 matches
Mail list logo