Thanks! I found, say, exp(x) causes 2 duplications whereas sum(x) 0
duplication. Is there any document to learn from about this?
(first time list user. sorry if anything about the posting procedure is
wrong)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Matt Shotwell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:15 -090
On 11-03-17 12:33 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method marku
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:29 , Gordon K Smyth wrote:
Hi Peter and others,
If it helps, I wrote a small function glm.scoretest() for the statmod
package on CRAN to compute score tests from glm fits. The score test
for adding a covariate, or any set of
John Maindonald writes:
> One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in
> that case.
>
> A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to
> abuse, there'd be nothing given at all!
Thanks John. I've been reluctant to push too hard for this on r-devel,
b
Dear Peter and Martin,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:08:18 +0100
peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2011, at 16:14 , Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> >> peter dalgaard
> >>on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0100 writes:
> >>
> >
> >> Back to the original question:
> >
> >> The current rstandar
On Mar 17, 2011, at 16:14 , Martin Maechler wrote:
>> peter dalgaard
>>on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0100 writes:
>>
>
>> Back to the original question:
>
>> The current rstandard() code reads
>
> ## FIXME ! -- make sure we are following "the literature":
> rstandard.glm <- funct
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
>> On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
>>> Windows):
>>>
>>> The \usage entries for
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
>> Windows):
>>
>> The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
>>>
>>> their full
On Mar 17, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Dr. Peter Ruckdeschel wrote:
> Hi r-devels,
>
> may I ask for an enhancement for download.packages()
> to optionally resolve package dependencies similarly to
> the respective functionality in install.packages() ?
>
> This would be a major help in compiling a large
> peter dalgaard
> on Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0100 writes:
> On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:34 , John Maindonald wrote:
>> One can easily test for the binary case and not give the
>> statistic in that case.
> Warning if expected cell counts < 5 would be another
> poss
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:34 , John Maindonald wrote:
> One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in that
> case.
Warning if expected cell counts < 5 would be another possibility.
>
> A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to abuse,
> there'd be
Hi r-devels,
may I ask for an enhancement for download.packages()
to optionally resolve package dependencies similarly to
the respective functionality in install.packages() ?
This would be a major help in compiling a large number of
packages (e.g. by means of download.view() from pkg ctv)
for lat
On Mar 16, 2011, at 23:29 , Gordon K Smyth wrote:
> Hi Peter and others,
>
> If it helps, I wrote a small function glm.scoretest() for the statmod package
> on CRAN to compute score tests from glm fits. The score test for adding a
> covariate, or any set of covariates, can be extracted very n
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ryan King wrote:
> I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
> looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
> code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
> Unfortunately, R looked for that var
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
their full name.
See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R
Extens
On 16/03/2011 7:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
their full name.
See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R
Extens
On 16/03/2011 4:14 PM, Ryan King wrote:
I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
Unfortunately, R looked for that variable in the glob
I've recently hunted down a troublesome bug in my own code, and am
looking for an easy mechanism to detect this kind of error in other R
code. The problem was an undefined variable inside of a function.
Unfortunately, R looked for that variable in the global environment
and found it since there wa
18 matches
Mail list logo
