On Mar 17, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Dr. Peter Ruckdeschel wrote:
> Hi r-devels,
>
> may I ask for an enhancement for download.packages()
> to optionally resolve package dependencies similarly to
> the respective functionality in install.packages() ?
>
> This would be a major help in compiling a large number of
> packages (e.g. by means of download.view() from pkg ctv)
> for later offline installations.
>
> Last November, I addressed Duncan Murdoch offline in this
> issue, and Duncan then seconded me---so the idea might not
> be this silly. He was pointing me to available.packages() which
> already provides a dependency list, which though would have
> to be parsed.
>
But you don't have to do it yourself - the code is already there, try
utils:::getDependencies("foo",,available.packages())
That said, just adding something along the lines of
if (!missing(dependencies)) pkg <- getDependencies(pkg, dependencies, available)
might be simple enough and do the trick ...
Cheers,
Simon
> AFAICS in the svn, as of rev54842, he has not found the time
> for looking deeper into this so far. Surely, like most of
> you, he has had more urgent issues to work on, but maybe
> someone (else) of you has an idea for an easy but still
> sustainable solution.
>
> Any suggestions appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
