On 19/08/10 19:49, Paul Johnson wrote:
Can one of you give me an R program that displays the benefits an
accelerated BLAS in R?
I thought the standard benchmark was (the somewhat artificial)
R-benchmark-25.R from
http://r.research.att.com/benchmarks/R-benchmark-25.R . I have some
exampl
> I've appended below the new version of the modified part of the
> do_transpose function in src/main/array.c.
A quick correction... A "break" went missing from the case INTSXP:
section of the code I posted. Corrected version below.
Radford Neal
--
Hi Spencer,
Each commit increments the svn revision number
regardless of the build status. md5sums on pkg may
not change for commits (only) to www and branches.
Yes, the DESCRIPTION file contains a field containing
the package version number. The author edits that field
and commits that change wh
On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
>>on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:06:07 +1000 writes:
>
>> I recently moved a function 'subset.with.warning' into the 'mvbutils'
>> package (a version not yet on CRAN). When I tried RCMD CHECK, I got this
>> warning:
>> * checking S3
Hi, Russ:
As noted by Brian Peterson in a separate email, R-Forge has a
"Revision" number in addition to the version number. For example, the
'fda' package is currently at version 2.2.3 with Rev.: 484 on R-Forge.
Each SVN Commit increments the Rev. number [after a successful build, I
thi
I earlier moved a part of this thread to R-Devel, and got some
replies there.
At least one page on R-Forge says, "We are currently adapting the
R-packages-plugin in order to work together with the new FusionForge
infrastructure. Some services are thus not yet available." I don't
>
> on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:06:07 +1000 writes:
> I recently moved a function 'subset.with.warning' into the 'mvbutils'
package (a version not yet on CRAN). When I tried RCMD CHECK, I got this
warning:
> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
> subset:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>
> I haven't tried it but I understand from the r-forge manual that it
> now supports foreign subversion repositories. One could host
> software on googlecode or other free subversion repository and still
> have it available through r-f
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Spencer Graves
wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
> Can anyone comment on plans for R-Forge? Please see thread below.
>
>
> Ramsay, Hooker and I would like to release a new version of "fda" to
> CRAN. We committed changes for it last Friday. I'd like to see reports
Spencer and David,
My experience of R-Forge :
i) SVN access and project management web pages have been *very* reliable all
this year ... up until the weekend. This week was the first time I ever saw
"R-Forge Could Not Connect to Database".
ii) The nightly build and checks have been consisten
Hello:
Can anyone comment on plans for R-Forge? Please see thread below.
Ramsay, Hooker and I would like to release a new version of "fda"
to CRAN. We committed changes for it last Friday. I'd like to see
reports of their "daily checks", then submit to CRAN from R-Forge.
Un
> "WD" == William Dunlap
> on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:31:27 -0700 writes:
WD> Should there be a [[<-.factor() that either throws
WD> an error or acts like [<-.factor() to avoid making
WD> an illegal object of class factor?
Yes, one or the other.
Note that both `[<-` and `[[<-
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 00:06 -0700, clusty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building a decision tree in R with the rpart package. Modeling is
> fine. But when it comes to scoring, I have the following issue:
>
> factor 'cust_language' has new level(s) OT
>
> I think this comes from the fact that when lear
Hello,
I'm building a decision tree in R with the rpart package. Modeling is
fine. But when it comes to scoring, I have the following issue:
factor 'cust_language' has new level(s) OT
I think this comes from the fact that when learning, the DT doesn't
see all the possible value of the factor va
14 matches
Mail list logo
