Paul,
On Nov 26, 2009, at 9:03 PM, Homer Paul Benton wrote:
> I'm currently using
>
> gcc --version
> i686-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5564)
That is the wrong compiler - it's a Leopard compiler (Xcode 3.1/3.1.1 to be
precise - see that it says darwin8 which is even 1
Paul,
at a first glance that seems like an issue in your system to me since
the errors come from system headers and not from our code. Which
compilers are you using and which Xcode version?
Cheers,
Simon
On Nov 26, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Homer Paul Benton wrote:
Dear R-gurus,
I'm trying to
Dear R-gurus,
I'm trying to compile R on my new mac. It's snow leopard. So far I've seemed to
be doing pretty well. I've looked at
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/tools/
http://r.research.att.com/exp/
http://r.research.att.com/building.html
http://r.research.att.com/tools/
All of which
He already asked... And I don t know any pkg implementing this
distribution...
iPhone.fan
Le 26 nov. 2009 à 21:22, Kjetil Halvorsen m> a écrit :
There is a CRAN Task View for probability Distributions. take a look
there!
Kjetil
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Steve Kalke > wrote:
Hell
There is a CRAN Task View for probability Distributions. take a look there!
Kjetil
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Steve Kalke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if there is an R-package available for computing the
> density, distribution function, quantiles and random numbers of the
> p-
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> This sounds like a good idea, though I would add a "package" parameter to
> the bug.report() function, rather than creating a new function.
I'm sure when I did help.search("bug") and help.search("report") this
morning I didn't see this fun
On 26/11/2009 9:20 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
> "DM" == Duncan Murdoch
> on Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:27 -0500 writes:
DM> On 26/11/2009 7:09 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
>> A lot of R packages are now effectively maintained by several people
>> and so use sites like R-forge
> "DM" == Duncan Murdoch
> on Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:27 -0500 writes:
DM> On 26/11/2009 7:09 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
>> A lot of R packages are now effectively maintained by several people
>> and so use sites like R-forge or google code for development. This
>> mea
On 26/11/2009 7:09 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
A lot of R packages are now effectively maintained by several people
and so use sites like R-forge or google code for development. This
means the best way to report bugs or problems with these packages is
via the development site's bug tracking rathe
A lot of R packages are now effectively maintained by several people
and so use sites like R-forge or google code for development. This
means the best way to report bugs or problems with these packages is
via the development site's bug tracking rather than emailing the
maintainer. Could we agree on
Putting on public record
library(spdep)
showMethods("[")
detach("package:spdep", unload = TRUE)
detach("package:Matrix", unload=TRUE)
showMethods("[") # sp methods still there
detach("package:spam", unload = TRUE)
showMethods("[") # sp methods have gone
This is one of several examples found by pa
11 matches
Mail list logo