On 10/4/19 4:48 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Provide the new transaction-based API. If a ptimer is created
> using ptimer_init() rather than ptimer_init_with_bh(), then
> instead of providing a QEMUBH, it provides a pointer to the
> callback function directly, and has opted into the transaction
> API
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Provide the new transaction-based API.
> +void ptimer_transaction_begin(ptimer_state *s)
> +{
> +assert(!s->in_transaction && s->callback);
> +s->in_transaction = true;
As I was working on converting the ptimer tests to the new
API I
Provide the new transaction-based API. If a ptimer is created
using ptimer_init() rather than ptimer_init_with_bh(), then
instead of providing a QEMUBH, it provides a pointer to the
callback function directly, and has opted into the transaction
API. All calls to functions which modify ptimer state:
