On 2012-11-01 17:13, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-11-01 03:55, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Jordan,
I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating a
>>
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-11-01 03:55, Jordan Justen wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Jordan,
>>>
>>> I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating a
>>> copy of the system flash for the low ISA range
On 2012-11-01 03:55, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Jordan,
>>
>> I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating a
>> copy of the system flash for the low ISA range instead of using an alias
>> here as well, just like old_pc_
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating a
> copy of the system flash for the low ISA range instead of using an alias
> here as well, just like old_pc_system_rom_init does. That means the ISA
> BIOS r
Hi Jordan,
I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating a
copy of the system flash for the low ISA range instead of using an alias
here as well, just like old_pc_system_rom_init does. That means the ISA
BIOS range can run out of sync when the system flash is updated during
