On 2012-11-01 03:55, Jordan Justen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Jordan, >> >> I was starring at pc_isa_bios_init and wondering why you are creating a >> copy of the system flash for the low ISA range instead of using an alias >> here as well, just like old_pc_system_rom_init does. That means the ISA >> BIOS range can run out of sync when the system flash is updated during >> runtime and requires a restart of QEMU then. Switching to an alias would >> also allow some code consolidation. Can you explain the idea behind the >> current version? > > I'm pretty sure I tried this and found that it did not work on the flash > device. > > I wrote an email to the list on Oct 17, 2011 about this, but I didn't > get a response. (Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] pc: Support system flash > memory with pflash)
Can you be more specific how/when it failed? A trivial test cannot confirm this so far. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
