Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20181030144358.23144-1-mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/24] qemu-ga patch queue for soft-freeze
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
Quoting Peter Maydell (2018-10-31 08:23:40)
> On 30 October 2018 at 20:57, Michael Roth wrote:
> > Sorry for the breakage. Static is indeed useful for qemu-ga, but libudev
> > isn't a hard dependency for qemu-ga so we can get away with simply
> > disabling libudev for static builds. Would the foll
On 30 October 2018 at 20:57, Michael Roth wrote:
> Sorry for the breakage. Static is indeed useful for qemu-ga, but libudev
> isn't a hard dependency for qemu-ga so we can get away with simply
> disabling libudev for static builds. Would the following (squashed into
> patch 04/24) be acceptable? T
Quoting Peter Maydell (2018-10-30 13:49:18)
> On 30 October 2018 at 14:43, Michael Roth wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 62b658db1df7c6fa574caae038144f24bf6ca495:
> >
> > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stefanha/tags/block-pull-request'
> > into staging (2018-10-29 17:03:27 +
On 30 October 2018 at 14:43, Michael Roth wrote:
> The following changes since commit 62b658db1df7c6fa574caae038144f24bf6ca495:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stefanha/tags/block-pull-request'
> into staging (2018-10-29 17:03:27 +)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
>
The following changes since commit 62b658db1df7c6fa574caae038144f24bf6ca495:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stefanha/tags/block-pull-request' into
staging (2018-10-29 17:03:27 +)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://github.com/mdroth/qemu.git tags/qga-pull-2018-10-30-tag
