Am 29.04.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
[...]
>>
>> This commit made it work.
>>
>> commit 7a11370e5e6c26566904bb7f08281093a3002ff2
>> Author: Michael S. Tsirkin
>> Date: Wed Oct 15 10:22:30 2014 +1030
>>
>> virtio_blk: enable VQs early
>>
>> virtio spec requires drivers
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:49:53PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 29.04.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> Am 29.04.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +02
Am 29.04.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 29.04.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:17:55 +0200
Christian
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 29.04.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:17:55 +0200
> >> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 28.04.2015 um 20:32
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:32:04 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > > And (surprise, surprise) virtio-blk now works - but it also works when
> > > I back out t
Am 29.04.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:17:55 +0200
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> Am 28.04.2015 um 20:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:14:44PM +0200, Michael
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:32:04 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > And (surprise, surprise) virtio-blk now works - but it also works when
> > I back out the atomic.h change again. No barrier problems :)
> >
> > Good news is that w
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:17:55 +0200
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> > Am 28.04.2015 um 20:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:14:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:3
On 2015/4/28 21:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 14:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > The patches look correct to me too, but I want s390
>> > cleaned up so it does not include COMMON_FEATURES
>> > in 100 places, and I prefer merging it all together.
> It seems a bit harsh to ask
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:17:55 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 28.04.2015 um 20:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:14:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24
Am 28.04.2015 um 20:32 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:14:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:40 +0100
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:34:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 19:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> > Yep, see my other reply... I'm no
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:32:51PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:14:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 28 A
On 28 April 2015 at 19:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> > Yep, see my other reply... I'm not quite sure what's wrong with
>> > event_idx on virtio-blk for s390-vi
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:14:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:40 +0100
> > > Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 28 Apri
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:40 +0100
> > Peter Maydell wrote:
> >
> > > On 28 April 2015 at 14:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > The patches look correct to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:40 +0100
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> > On 28 April 2015 at 14:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > The patches look correct to me too, but I want s390
> > > cleaned up so it does not include COMMON_FEATURES
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:20:54PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:05:47 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On 28 April 2015 at 13:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:51:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:40 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 14:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > The patches look correct to me too, but I want s390
> > cleaned up so it does not include COMMON_FEATURES
> > in 100 places, and I prefer merging it all together.
>
> It seems a bi
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:05:47 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 28 April 2015 at 13:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:51:11PM +0800, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
> > >> From: Shannon Zhao
> > >
On 28 April 2015 at 14:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The patches look correct to me too, but I want s390
> cleaned up so it does not include COMMON_FEATURES
> in 100 places, and I prefer merging it all together.
It seems a bit harsh to ask Shannon to do s390 cleanup when
he doesn't have any acc
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 12:51, wrote:
> > From: Shannon Zhao
> >
> > The reason to do this is that the virtio-net-device can't expose host
> > features to guest while using virtio-mmio. So the performance is low.
> >
> > The virtio-*-p
On 28 April 2015 at 12:51, wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> The reason to do this is that the virtio-net-device can't expose host
> features to guest while using virtio-mmio. So the performance is low.
>
> The virtio-*-pci, virtio-*-s390, and virtio-*-ccw already have the
> ability to forward pro
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 13:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:51:11PM +0800, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
> >> From: Shannon Zhao
> >> Here we move the host features to backends, involving
> >> DEFINE_VIRTIO_
On 28 April 2015 at 13:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:51:11PM +0800, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Shannon Zhao
>> Here we move the host features to backends, involving
>> DEFINE_VIRTIO_NET_FEATURES, DEFINE_VIRTIO_SCSI_FEATURES. So the
>> virtio-mmio devices
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:51:11PM +0800, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> The reason to do this is that the virtio-net-device can't expose host
> features to guest while using virtio-mmio. So the performance is low.
>
> The virtio-*-pci, virtio-*-s390, and virtio-*-ccw al
From: Shannon Zhao
The reason to do this is that the virtio-net-device can't expose host
features to guest while using virtio-mmio. So the performance is low.
The virtio-*-pci, virtio-*-s390, and virtio-*-ccw already have the
ability to forward property accesses to the backend child, by calling
27 matches
Mail list logo