On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:40 +0100 > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On 28 April 2015 at 14:13, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > The patches look correct to me too, but I want s390 > > > cleaned up so it does not include COMMON_FEATURES > > > in 100 places, and I prefer merging it all together. > > > > It seems a bit harsh to ask Shannon to do s390 cleanup when > > he doesn't have any access to s390 guests or test cases... > > Making S390 put COMMON_FEATURES in the right places seems > > to me like a separate bit of s390-specific cleanup. > > Yep, see my other reply... I'm not quite sure what's wrong with > event_idx on virtio-blk for s390-virtio, or I would gladly make this > consistent with the other transports. Any hints appreciated :)
Is this still happening? It is possible that what was missing was 92045d80badc43c9f95897aad675dc7ef17a3b3f and/or a281ebc11a6917fbc27e1a93bb5772cd14e241fc -- MST
