On 23 March 2018 at 21:43, Onur Sahin wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Peter. Removing the redundant check on bit
> 23 and adding checks for the "should be" bits as well (bits [11:8]).
>
> The following patch should make sure we are not treating
> architecturally Undefined instructions as a SWP, b
Thanks for the feedback Peter. Removing the redundant check on bit
23 and adding checks for the "should be" bits as well (bits [11:8]).
The following patch should make sure we are not treating
architecturally Undefined instructions as a SWP, by verifying
the opcodes as per section A8.8.229 of ARMv