Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/09/2012 10:47, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>> Old code used !io_thread to know if a thread was an vcpu or not. That
>> fails when we introduce the iothread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
>> ---
>> cpus.c | 9 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 delet
Il 21/09/2012 16:48, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>> >>
>>> >> +static bool qemu_cpu_is_vcpu(void)
>>> >> +{
>>> >> +return cpu_single_env && qemu_cpu_is_self(&cpu_single_env);
>> >
>> > Should be "cpu_single_env && qemu_cpu_is_self(&cpu_single_env)".
> "cpu_single_env && qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu_s
Am 21.09.2012 14:54, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 21/09/2012 10:47, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>> Old code used !io_thread to know if a thread was an vcpu or not. That
>> fails when we introduce the iothread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
>> ---
>> cpus.c | 9 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 i
Il 21/09/2012 10:47, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> Old code used !io_thread to know if a thread was an vcpu or not. That
> fails when we introduce the iothread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> ---
> cpus.c | 9 +++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpus.
Old code used !io_thread to know if a thread was an vcpu or not. That
fails when we introduce the iothread.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
cpus.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index e476a3c..1b7061a 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.