On 12/10/16 02:42, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 04:42 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> I'm fairly sure that I've tested an earlier version of this patchset,
>> however just to confirm is it just that you want a Tested-by from me of
>> this branch based upon the v6 atomics patch? If so I
On 10/11/2016 04:42 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
I'm fairly sure that I've tested an earlier version of this patchset,
however just to confirm is it just that you want a Tested-by from me of
this branch based upon the v6 atomics patch? If so I can run it against
all of my SPARC/SPARC64 test images
On 10/10/16 16:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The two main goals in this patch set are:
>
> * Make use of the new MO_ALIGN_* flags, to allow less use of
>check_align, and support partially misaligned fp memory ops.
>
> * More cleanups for ASIs, in the end using the new atomic ops.
>
> The
Hi,
Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] target-sparc improvements
Message-id: 1476112628-12241-1-git-send-email-...@twiddle.net
Type: series
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
total
The two main goals in this patch set are:
* Make use of the new MO_ALIGN_* flags, to allow less use of
check_align, and support partially misaligned fp memory ops.
* More cleanups for ASIs, in the end using the new atomic ops.
The final two patches require the "cmpxchg atomic" v5 patch set
