On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 03:47:39PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Whilst looking at implementing another DBDMA device for the Mac machines
> I noticed a couple of things: firstly there were some unused fields still
> in DBDMAState, and secondly the existing code still used global functions
> to r
Whilst looking at implementing another DBDMA device for the Mac machines
I noticed a couple of things: firstly there were some unused fields still
in DBDMAState, and secondly the existing code still used global functions
to register DMA channels and handle the relationship between macio IDE and
DBD
