On 7/23/20 11:45 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Laurent Vivier
>
> Our safe_clock_nanosleep() returns -1 and updates errno.
>
> We don't need to update the CRF bit in syscall.c because it will
> be updated in ppc/cpu_loop.c as the return value is negative.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier
> S
From: Laurent Vivier
Our safe_clock_nanosleep() returns -1 and updates errno.
We don't need to update the CRF bit in syscall.c because it will
be updated in ppc/cpu_loop.c as the return value is negative.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Message-Id: <20200722174612.291
